Human rights in times of pandemics: necessity and proportionality
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
Standard
Human rights in times of pandemics : necessity and proportionality. / Ó Cathaoir, Katharina.
COVID-19 and Human Rights. ed. / Morten Kjaerum; Martha F. Davis; Amanda Lyons. Routledge, 2021.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Human rights in times of pandemics
T2 - necessity and proportionality
AU - Ó Cathaoir, Katharina
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Human rights based governance is crucial in a pandemic but what does this entail? This chapter presents a health and human rights approach that calls for state actors to respect the principles of necessity and proportionality through governing with solidarity, trust and transparency, instead of coercion and fear. Policy makers must learn from past pandemics, in particular HIV/ AIDS, and protect and respect all rights.Using this approach, problematic elements of European states’ legislative responses to COVID-19 are highlighted, using restrictions on movement as a case study. Firstly, several examples are explored, such as stay at home orders targeting elders, pregnant women and children, as well as bans on outdoor exercise, where it is suggested that in line with the principle of proportionality, less restrictive measures could be as effective. Secondly, for the wealthy and those living in safe environments, stay at home orders may provide a proportionate response, while for other groups, impacts may be disproportionate, and sometimes discriminatory. Thirdly, while scientific certainty is impossible with a novel virus, measures that run contrary to scientific evidence should be avoided. The widespread use of criminal sanctions runs contrary to the human rights approach.
AB - Human rights based governance is crucial in a pandemic but what does this entail? This chapter presents a health and human rights approach that calls for state actors to respect the principles of necessity and proportionality through governing with solidarity, trust and transparency, instead of coercion and fear. Policy makers must learn from past pandemics, in particular HIV/ AIDS, and protect and respect all rights.Using this approach, problematic elements of European states’ legislative responses to COVID-19 are highlighted, using restrictions on movement as a case study. Firstly, several examples are explored, such as stay at home orders targeting elders, pregnant women and children, as well as bans on outdoor exercise, where it is suggested that in line with the principle of proportionality, less restrictive measures could be as effective. Secondly, for the wealthy and those living in safe environments, stay at home orders may provide a proportionate response, while for other groups, impacts may be disproportionate, and sometimes discriminatory. Thirdly, while scientific certainty is impossible with a novel virus, measures that run contrary to scientific evidence should be avoided. The widespread use of criminal sanctions runs contrary to the human rights approach.
U2 - 10.4324/9781003139140-4
DO - 10.4324/9781003139140-4
M3 - Book chapter
SN - 9780367688035
BT - COVID-19 and Human Rights
A2 - Kjaerum, Morten
A2 - F. Davis, Martha
A2 - Lyons, Amanda
PB - Routledge
ER -
ID: 251255200