Effects of supervised exercise compared to non-supervised exercise early after total hip replacement on patient-reported function, pain, health-related quality of life and performance-based function – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Effects of supervised exercise compared to non-supervised exercise early after total hip replacement on patient-reported function, pain, health-related quality of life and performance-based function – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. / Hansen, Sebrina; Aaboe, Jens; Mechlenburg, Inger; Overgaard, Søren; Mikkelsen, Lone Ramer.

In: Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.2019, p. 13-23.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Hansen, S, Aaboe, J, Mechlenburg, I, Overgaard, S & Mikkelsen, LR 2019, 'Effects of supervised exercise compared to non-supervised exercise early after total hip replacement on patient-reported function, pain, health-related quality of life and performance-based function – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials', Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215518791213

APA

Hansen, S., Aaboe, J., Mechlenburg, I., Overgaard, S., & Mikkelsen, L. R. (2019). Effects of supervised exercise compared to non-supervised exercise early after total hip replacement on patient-reported function, pain, health-related quality of life and performance-based function – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical Rehabilitation, 33(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215518791213

Vancouver

Hansen S, Aaboe J, Mechlenburg I, Overgaard S, Mikkelsen LR. Effects of supervised exercise compared to non-supervised exercise early after total hip replacement on patient-reported function, pain, health-related quality of life and performance-based function – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2019 Jan;33(1):13-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215518791213

Author

Hansen, Sebrina ; Aaboe, Jens ; Mechlenburg, Inger ; Overgaard, Søren ; Mikkelsen, Lone Ramer. / Effects of supervised exercise compared to non-supervised exercise early after total hip replacement on patient-reported function, pain, health-related quality of life and performance-based function – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. In: Clinical Rehabilitation. 2019 ; Vol. 33, No. 1. pp. 13-23.

Bibtex

@article{f9e5286e864547c188d8fee0f1651f9d,
title = "Effects of supervised exercise compared to non-supervised exercise early after total hip replacement on patient-reported function, pain, health-related quality of life and performance-based function – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials",
abstract = "Background: The rehabilitation after a total hip replacement varies in degree of supervision; however, it remains unknown whether supervised programmes are more effective than non-supervised. Objective: This study compared the effectiveness of supervised exercise compared to non-supervised home-based exercise after total hip replacement on patient-reported function, hip-pain, health-related quality of life and performance-based function. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of supervised exercise compared to non-supervised home-based exercise. An electronic search was performed in Medline, Embase and CINAHL on 14 March 2018. The methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results: Seven studies were included with a total of 389 participants. A small and non-significant difference in favour of the supervised groups was found in patient-reported function (standardized mean difference (SMD) −0.22 (95% confidence interval (CI) −0.46 to 0.02)), hip-related pain (SMD −0.03 (95% CI −0.27 to 0.21)), health-related quality of life (mean difference (MD) −3.08 (95% CI −6.29 to 0.14)) and performance-based function (SMD −0.26 (95% CI −0.68 to 0.17)) at end of treatment and in patient-reported function (MD −1.31 (95% CI −3.79 to 1.16)) at the 6- to 12-month follow-up. Limitations: The literature search was systematic, but limited to three databases. The overall quality of evidence was downgraded to moderate due to lack of blinding in included studies. Conclusion: Supervised exercise was not significantly effective compared to non-supervised home-based exercise on patient-reported function, pain, health-related quality of life and performance-based function after primary total hip replacement. Others: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017055604",
author = "Sebrina Hansen and Jens Aaboe and Inger Mechlenburg and S{\o}ren Overgaard and Mikkelsen, {Lone Ramer}",
year = "2019",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1177/0269215518791213",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "13--23",
journal = "Clinical Rehabilitation",
issn = "0269-2155",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of supervised exercise compared to non-supervised exercise early after total hip replacement on patient-reported function, pain, health-related quality of life and performance-based function – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AU - Hansen, Sebrina

AU - Aaboe, Jens

AU - Mechlenburg, Inger

AU - Overgaard, Søren

AU - Mikkelsen, Lone Ramer

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - Background: The rehabilitation after a total hip replacement varies in degree of supervision; however, it remains unknown whether supervised programmes are more effective than non-supervised. Objective: This study compared the effectiveness of supervised exercise compared to non-supervised home-based exercise after total hip replacement on patient-reported function, hip-pain, health-related quality of life and performance-based function. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of supervised exercise compared to non-supervised home-based exercise. An electronic search was performed in Medline, Embase and CINAHL on 14 March 2018. The methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results: Seven studies were included with a total of 389 participants. A small and non-significant difference in favour of the supervised groups was found in patient-reported function (standardized mean difference (SMD) −0.22 (95% confidence interval (CI) −0.46 to 0.02)), hip-related pain (SMD −0.03 (95% CI −0.27 to 0.21)), health-related quality of life (mean difference (MD) −3.08 (95% CI −6.29 to 0.14)) and performance-based function (SMD −0.26 (95% CI −0.68 to 0.17)) at end of treatment and in patient-reported function (MD −1.31 (95% CI −3.79 to 1.16)) at the 6- to 12-month follow-up. Limitations: The literature search was systematic, but limited to three databases. The overall quality of evidence was downgraded to moderate due to lack of blinding in included studies. Conclusion: Supervised exercise was not significantly effective compared to non-supervised home-based exercise on patient-reported function, pain, health-related quality of life and performance-based function after primary total hip replacement. Others: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017055604

AB - Background: The rehabilitation after a total hip replacement varies in degree of supervision; however, it remains unknown whether supervised programmes are more effective than non-supervised. Objective: This study compared the effectiveness of supervised exercise compared to non-supervised home-based exercise after total hip replacement on patient-reported function, hip-pain, health-related quality of life and performance-based function. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of supervised exercise compared to non-supervised home-based exercise. An electronic search was performed in Medline, Embase and CINAHL on 14 March 2018. The methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results: Seven studies were included with a total of 389 participants. A small and non-significant difference in favour of the supervised groups was found in patient-reported function (standardized mean difference (SMD) −0.22 (95% confidence interval (CI) −0.46 to 0.02)), hip-related pain (SMD −0.03 (95% CI −0.27 to 0.21)), health-related quality of life (mean difference (MD) −3.08 (95% CI −6.29 to 0.14)) and performance-based function (SMD −0.26 (95% CI −0.68 to 0.17)) at end of treatment and in patient-reported function (MD −1.31 (95% CI −3.79 to 1.16)) at the 6- to 12-month follow-up. Limitations: The literature search was systematic, but limited to three databases. The overall quality of evidence was downgraded to moderate due to lack of blinding in included studies. Conclusion: Supervised exercise was not significantly effective compared to non-supervised home-based exercise on patient-reported function, pain, health-related quality of life and performance-based function after primary total hip replacement. Others: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017055604

U2 - 10.1177/0269215518791213

DO - 10.1177/0269215518791213

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30073856

AN - SCOPUS:85052319999

VL - 33

SP - 13

EP - 23

JO - Clinical Rehabilitation

JF - Clinical Rehabilitation

SN - 0269-2155

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 252058037