Crowdsourced data in public administration research: A review and look to the future

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Crowdsourced data in public administration research : A review and look to the future. / Stritch, Justin M.; Pedersen, Mogens Jin; Pezo, Ignacio.

In: Public Administration Review, 29.04.2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Stritch, JM, Pedersen, MJ & Pezo, I 2024, 'Crowdsourced data in public administration research: A review and look to the future', Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13823

APA

Stritch, J. M., Pedersen, M. J., & Pezo, I. (2024). Crowdsourced data in public administration research: A review and look to the future. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13823

Vancouver

Stritch JM, Pedersen MJ, Pezo I. Crowdsourced data in public administration research: A review and look to the future. Public Administration Review. 2024 Apr 29. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13823

Author

Stritch, Justin M. ; Pedersen, Mogens Jin ; Pezo, Ignacio. / Crowdsourced data in public administration research : A review and look to the future. In: Public Administration Review. 2024.

Bibtex

@article{f9ef4e5d512140a0a94431df362aa5d8,
title = "Crowdsourced data in public administration research: A review and look to the future",
abstract = "Crowdsourcing platforms such as MTurk and Prolific have emerged as data sources for researchers in the social sciences. This article delves into the past, present, and future use of crowdsourced data in public administration scholarship. Through a review of published articles in top public administration journals (years 2013–2022), we uncover a general growth in the use of crowdsourced data over time. Additionally, we document how researchers have leveraged crowdsourced data to study a diverse range of themes and topics, with particular emphasis on survey experimental approaches and the examination of citizen attitudes and responses. Moreover, drawing on insights from a survey among quantitative public administration researchers, we discuss why the use of crowdsourced data is unlikely to diminish in the foreseeable future—despite ongoing debates regarding data quality and validity. We provide a set of guiding questions for researchers to consider when using crowdsourced data in public administration studies.",
author = "Stritch, {Justin M.} and Pedersen, {Mogens Jin} and Ignacio Pezo",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 American Society for Public Administration.",
year = "2024",
month = apr,
day = "29",
doi = "10.1111/puar.13823",
language = "English",
journal = "Public Administration Review",
issn = "0033-3352",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crowdsourced data in public administration research

T2 - A review and look to the future

AU - Stritch, Justin M.

AU - Pedersen, Mogens Jin

AU - Pezo, Ignacio

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 American Society for Public Administration.

PY - 2024/4/29

Y1 - 2024/4/29

N2 - Crowdsourcing platforms such as MTurk and Prolific have emerged as data sources for researchers in the social sciences. This article delves into the past, present, and future use of crowdsourced data in public administration scholarship. Through a review of published articles in top public administration journals (years 2013–2022), we uncover a general growth in the use of crowdsourced data over time. Additionally, we document how researchers have leveraged crowdsourced data to study a diverse range of themes and topics, with particular emphasis on survey experimental approaches and the examination of citizen attitudes and responses. Moreover, drawing on insights from a survey among quantitative public administration researchers, we discuss why the use of crowdsourced data is unlikely to diminish in the foreseeable future—despite ongoing debates regarding data quality and validity. We provide a set of guiding questions for researchers to consider when using crowdsourced data in public administration studies.

AB - Crowdsourcing platforms such as MTurk and Prolific have emerged as data sources for researchers in the social sciences. This article delves into the past, present, and future use of crowdsourced data in public administration scholarship. Through a review of published articles in top public administration journals (years 2013–2022), we uncover a general growth in the use of crowdsourced data over time. Additionally, we document how researchers have leveraged crowdsourced data to study a diverse range of themes and topics, with particular emphasis on survey experimental approaches and the examination of citizen attitudes and responses. Moreover, drawing on insights from a survey among quantitative public administration researchers, we discuss why the use of crowdsourced data is unlikely to diminish in the foreseeable future—despite ongoing debates regarding data quality and validity. We provide a set of guiding questions for researchers to consider when using crowdsourced data in public administration studies.

U2 - 10.1111/puar.13823

DO - 10.1111/puar.13823

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85190402580

JO - Public Administration Review

JF - Public Administration Review

SN - 0033-3352

ER -

ID: 390191651