Can alternative N-fertilization methods influence GHG emissions and biomass production in sugarcane fields?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Can alternative N-fertilization methods influence GHG emissions and biomass production in sugarcane fields? / Borges, Clovis D.; Carvalho, João Luís N.; Kölln, Oriel T.; Sanches, Guilherme M.; Silva, Marcelo J.; Castro, Sergio G.Q.; Castro, Saulo A.Q.; Sousa, Luara L.; Oliveira, Juliana V.C.; Cantarella, Heitor; Vargas, Vitor P.; Tsai, Siu M.; Franco, Henrique C.J.

In: Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 120, 01.2019, p. 21-27.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Borges, CD, Carvalho, JLN, Kölln, OT, Sanches, GM, Silva, MJ, Castro, SGQ, Castro, SAQ, Sousa, LL, Oliveira, JVC, Cantarella, H, Vargas, VP, Tsai, SM & Franco, HCJ 2019, 'Can alternative N-fertilization methods influence GHG emissions and biomass production in sugarcane fields?', Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 120, pp. 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.10.017

APA

Borges, C. D., Carvalho, J. L. N., Kölln, O. T., Sanches, G. M., Silva, M. J., Castro, S. G. Q., Castro, S. A. Q., Sousa, L. L., Oliveira, J. V. C., Cantarella, H., Vargas, V. P., Tsai, S. M., & Franco, H. C. J. (2019). Can alternative N-fertilization methods influence GHG emissions and biomass production in sugarcane fields? Biomass and Bioenergy, 120, 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.10.017

Vancouver

Borges CD, Carvalho JLN, Kölln OT, Sanches GM, Silva MJ, Castro SGQ et al. Can alternative N-fertilization methods influence GHG emissions and biomass production in sugarcane fields? Biomass and Bioenergy. 2019 Jan;120:21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.10.017

Author

Borges, Clovis D. ; Carvalho, João Luís N. ; Kölln, Oriel T. ; Sanches, Guilherme M. ; Silva, Marcelo J. ; Castro, Sergio G.Q. ; Castro, Saulo A.Q. ; Sousa, Luara L. ; Oliveira, Juliana V.C. ; Cantarella, Heitor ; Vargas, Vitor P. ; Tsai, Siu M. ; Franco, Henrique C.J. / Can alternative N-fertilization methods influence GHG emissions and biomass production in sugarcane fields?. In: Biomass and Bioenergy. 2019 ; Vol. 120. pp. 21-27.

Bibtex

@article{66c696a937af4126978ef724d1496d51,
title = "Can alternative N-fertilization methods influence GHG emissions and biomass production in sugarcane fields?",
abstract = "This study evaluated the effect of different N fertilizer application methods on N2O and CH4 emissions and on sugarcane biomass yields over two successive growing seasons. Treatments included three methods of N fertilizer (120 kg ha−1 N) application: 1) above the straw layer; 2) below the straw layer; 3) incorporated into the soil (at 0.1-m soil depth) below the straw layer; and 4) no N application (control). Sugarcane yield for the above straw treatment was, on average, 12% and 15% lower than below the straw and incorporated into the soil, respectively. Emissions of CH4 were very low and unaffected by N fertilizer placement. The method and timing of N application influenced N2O emissions. For both years, higher N2O emissions were observed from the above straw, followed by below straw and incorporated treatments. Except for the above straw treatment during the wet season, the N2O emission factors ranged from 0.08 to 0.62 and were lower than the IPCC default value (1%). The intensity of N2O emissions was, on average, 7.45, 3.97 and 3.3 kg CO2eq Mg stalk−1 for N applied above straw, below straw and incorporated into the soil, respectively. Changes in the N fertilizer placement method and on the timing of application can significantly reduce GHG emissions during sugarcane production, making a significant contribution toward a cleaner production of sugarcane ethanol.",
keywords = "Bioethanol, Nitrogen cycle, Nitrous oxide emissions, Saccharum spp., Sugarcane straw",
author = "Borges, {Clovis D.} and Carvalho, {Jo{\~a}o Lu{\'i}s N.} and K{\"o}lln, {Oriel T.} and Sanches, {Guilherme M.} and Silva, {Marcelo J.} and Castro, {Sergio G.Q.} and Castro, {Saulo A.Q.} and Sousa, {Luara L.} and Oliveira, {Juliana V.C.} and Heitor Cantarella and Vargas, {Vitor P.} and Tsai, {Siu M.} and Franco, {Henrique C.J.}",
note = "Funding Information: This research was supported by the S{\~a}o Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP - 2015/23186-8 and 2015/21893-9 ). We are grateful for the financial support of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq - 449656/2014-4 and 150780/2015-0 ). We also thank the Iracema Mill who permitted use of the study area and provided logistical support during the field work. We are grateful to Laura K Meredith for critical review and constructive comments on a previous draft of this manuscript. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 Elsevier Ltd",
year = "2019",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.10.017",
language = "English",
volume = "120",
pages = "21--27",
journal = "Biomass & Bioenergy",
issn = "0961-9534",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can alternative N-fertilization methods influence GHG emissions and biomass production in sugarcane fields?

AU - Borges, Clovis D.

AU - Carvalho, João Luís N.

AU - Kölln, Oriel T.

AU - Sanches, Guilherme M.

AU - Silva, Marcelo J.

AU - Castro, Sergio G.Q.

AU - Castro, Saulo A.Q.

AU - Sousa, Luara L.

AU - Oliveira, Juliana V.C.

AU - Cantarella, Heitor

AU - Vargas, Vitor P.

AU - Tsai, Siu M.

AU - Franco, Henrique C.J.

N1 - Funding Information: This research was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP - 2015/23186-8 and 2015/21893-9 ). We are grateful for the financial support of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq - 449656/2014-4 and 150780/2015-0 ). We also thank the Iracema Mill who permitted use of the study area and provided logistical support during the field work. We are grateful to Laura K Meredith for critical review and constructive comments on a previous draft of this manuscript. Publisher Copyright: © 2018 Elsevier Ltd

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - This study evaluated the effect of different N fertilizer application methods on N2O and CH4 emissions and on sugarcane biomass yields over two successive growing seasons. Treatments included three methods of N fertilizer (120 kg ha−1 N) application: 1) above the straw layer; 2) below the straw layer; 3) incorporated into the soil (at 0.1-m soil depth) below the straw layer; and 4) no N application (control). Sugarcane yield for the above straw treatment was, on average, 12% and 15% lower than below the straw and incorporated into the soil, respectively. Emissions of CH4 were very low and unaffected by N fertilizer placement. The method and timing of N application influenced N2O emissions. For both years, higher N2O emissions were observed from the above straw, followed by below straw and incorporated treatments. Except for the above straw treatment during the wet season, the N2O emission factors ranged from 0.08 to 0.62 and were lower than the IPCC default value (1%). The intensity of N2O emissions was, on average, 7.45, 3.97 and 3.3 kg CO2eq Mg stalk−1 for N applied above straw, below straw and incorporated into the soil, respectively. Changes in the N fertilizer placement method and on the timing of application can significantly reduce GHG emissions during sugarcane production, making a significant contribution toward a cleaner production of sugarcane ethanol.

AB - This study evaluated the effect of different N fertilizer application methods on N2O and CH4 emissions and on sugarcane biomass yields over two successive growing seasons. Treatments included three methods of N fertilizer (120 kg ha−1 N) application: 1) above the straw layer; 2) below the straw layer; 3) incorporated into the soil (at 0.1-m soil depth) below the straw layer; and 4) no N application (control). Sugarcane yield for the above straw treatment was, on average, 12% and 15% lower than below the straw and incorporated into the soil, respectively. Emissions of CH4 were very low and unaffected by N fertilizer placement. The method and timing of N application influenced N2O emissions. For both years, higher N2O emissions were observed from the above straw, followed by below straw and incorporated treatments. Except for the above straw treatment during the wet season, the N2O emission factors ranged from 0.08 to 0.62 and were lower than the IPCC default value (1%). The intensity of N2O emissions was, on average, 7.45, 3.97 and 3.3 kg CO2eq Mg stalk−1 for N applied above straw, below straw and incorporated into the soil, respectively. Changes in the N fertilizer placement method and on the timing of application can significantly reduce GHG emissions during sugarcane production, making a significant contribution toward a cleaner production of sugarcane ethanol.

KW - Bioethanol

KW - Nitrogen cycle

KW - Nitrous oxide emissions

KW - Saccharum spp.

KW - Sugarcane straw

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056163727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.10.017

DO - 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.10.017

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85056163727

VL - 120

SP - 21

EP - 27

JO - Biomass & Bioenergy

JF - Biomass & Bioenergy

SN - 0961-9534

ER -

ID: 327389973