Archival Encounters: Rethinking access and care in digital colonial archives

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Archival Encounters : Rethinking access and care in digital colonial archives. / Agostinho, Daniela.

In: Archival Science, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2019, p. 141-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Agostinho, D 2019, 'Archival Encounters: Rethinking access and care in digital colonial archives', Archival Science, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 141-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09312-0

APA

Agostinho, D. (2019). Archival Encounters: Rethinking access and care in digital colonial archives. Archival Science, 19(2), 141-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09312-0

Vancouver

Agostinho D. Archival Encounters: Rethinking access and care in digital colonial archives. Archival Science. 2019;19(2):141-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09312-0

Author

Agostinho, Daniela. / Archival Encounters : Rethinking access and care in digital colonial archives. In: Archival Science. 2019 ; Vol. 19, No. 2. pp. 141-165.

Bibtex

@article{324fd7e71efb4989b0e773a75b91b2a8,
title = "Archival Encounters: Rethinking access and care in digital colonial archives",
abstract = "The year of 2017 marked the centennial of Denmark’s sale of the former Danish West Indies to the United States of America, today the US Virgin Islands (USVI). The colonial archives figured prominently during the year-long commemorations in Denmark, as the Danish National Archives digitized and publicly released the colonial records of the islands of St. Croix, St. Thomas and St. John. Drawing on cultural theories as well as debates in archival science, this article proposes the notion of ‘archival encounter’ to centre the ethical-epistemological challenges of digitization and to emphasize the intersected problematics raised by the encounter between the colonial, the archival and the digital. The article begins by revisiting the history of these archives in order to situate the digitization of these records within debates on provenance, custody and access. It then introduces some of the debates taking place within the field of Atlantic slavery, as well as feminist and critical race theories, to argue that the digitization of the USVI records recasts questions about the limitations and possibilities of colonial archives. Furthermore, the article contends that digitality and datafication are indebted to colonial histories of quantification that structure the technological encounter with the colonial archive. Finally, the article builds on these theorizations to amplify recent calls for a feminist ethics of care in archival praxis. Drawing on postcolonial critiques, the article problematizes and situates the notion of care within the colonial and non-innocent histories in which it is embedded, in order to align ethics of care with a critical reorientation of digital colonial archives. Marshalling a postcolonial feminist critique of care as a framework for thinking, the article suggests, can help us to realign archival encounters in ways that that more pointedly confront the colonial legacies of our present.",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, Colonial archives, United States Virgin Islands, Denmark, Digitization, Access, Postcolonial ethics of care",
author = "Daniela Agostinho",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1007/s10502-019-09312-0",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "141--165",
journal = "Archival Science",
issn = "1389-0166",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Archival Encounters

T2 - Rethinking access and care in digital colonial archives

AU - Agostinho, Daniela

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The year of 2017 marked the centennial of Denmark’s sale of the former Danish West Indies to the United States of America, today the US Virgin Islands (USVI). The colonial archives figured prominently during the year-long commemorations in Denmark, as the Danish National Archives digitized and publicly released the colonial records of the islands of St. Croix, St. Thomas and St. John. Drawing on cultural theories as well as debates in archival science, this article proposes the notion of ‘archival encounter’ to centre the ethical-epistemological challenges of digitization and to emphasize the intersected problematics raised by the encounter between the colonial, the archival and the digital. The article begins by revisiting the history of these archives in order to situate the digitization of these records within debates on provenance, custody and access. It then introduces some of the debates taking place within the field of Atlantic slavery, as well as feminist and critical race theories, to argue that the digitization of the USVI records recasts questions about the limitations and possibilities of colonial archives. Furthermore, the article contends that digitality and datafication are indebted to colonial histories of quantification that structure the technological encounter with the colonial archive. Finally, the article builds on these theorizations to amplify recent calls for a feminist ethics of care in archival praxis. Drawing on postcolonial critiques, the article problematizes and situates the notion of care within the colonial and non-innocent histories in which it is embedded, in order to align ethics of care with a critical reorientation of digital colonial archives. Marshalling a postcolonial feminist critique of care as a framework for thinking, the article suggests, can help us to realign archival encounters in ways that that more pointedly confront the colonial legacies of our present.

AB - The year of 2017 marked the centennial of Denmark’s sale of the former Danish West Indies to the United States of America, today the US Virgin Islands (USVI). The colonial archives figured prominently during the year-long commemorations in Denmark, as the Danish National Archives digitized and publicly released the colonial records of the islands of St. Croix, St. Thomas and St. John. Drawing on cultural theories as well as debates in archival science, this article proposes the notion of ‘archival encounter’ to centre the ethical-epistemological challenges of digitization and to emphasize the intersected problematics raised by the encounter between the colonial, the archival and the digital. The article begins by revisiting the history of these archives in order to situate the digitization of these records within debates on provenance, custody and access. It then introduces some of the debates taking place within the field of Atlantic slavery, as well as feminist and critical race theories, to argue that the digitization of the USVI records recasts questions about the limitations and possibilities of colonial archives. Furthermore, the article contends that digitality and datafication are indebted to colonial histories of quantification that structure the technological encounter with the colonial archive. Finally, the article builds on these theorizations to amplify recent calls for a feminist ethics of care in archival praxis. Drawing on postcolonial critiques, the article problematizes and situates the notion of care within the colonial and non-innocent histories in which it is embedded, in order to align ethics of care with a critical reorientation of digital colonial archives. Marshalling a postcolonial feminist critique of care as a framework for thinking, the article suggests, can help us to realign archival encounters in ways that that more pointedly confront the colonial legacies of our present.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - Colonial archives

KW - United States Virgin Islands

KW - Denmark

KW - Digitization

KW - Access

KW - Postcolonial ethics of care

U2 - 10.1007/s10502-019-09312-0

DO - 10.1007/s10502-019-09312-0

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 141

EP - 165

JO - Archival Science

JF - Archival Science

SN - 1389-0166

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 216217567