3-D-Printed Models for Temporal Bone Training: A Validity Study
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
3-D-Printed Models for Temporal Bone Training : A Validity Study. / Frithioff, Andreas; Frendø, Martin; Weiss, Kenneth; Foghsgaard, Søren; Mikkelsen, Peter Trier; Frederiksen, Thomas Winther; Pedersen, David Bue; Sørensen, Mads Sølvsten; Andersen, Steven Arild Wuyts.
In: Otology & Neurotology, Vol. 44, No. 7, 2023, p. e497-e503.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - 3-D-Printed Models for Temporal Bone Training
T2 - A Validity Study
AU - Frithioff, Andreas
AU - Frendø, Martin
AU - Weiss, Kenneth
AU - Foghsgaard, Søren
AU - Mikkelsen, Peter Trier
AU - Frederiksen, Thomas Winther
AU - Pedersen, David Bue
AU - Sørensen, Mads Sølvsten
AU - Andersen, Steven Arild Wuyts
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Objective 3-D printing offers convenient and low-cost mastoidectomy training; nonetheless, training benefits using 3-D-printed temporal bones remain largely unexplored. In this study, we have collected validity evidence for a low-cost, 3-D-printed temporal bone for mastoidectomy training and established a credible pass/fail score for performance on the model. Study design A prospective educational study gathering validity evidence using Messick's validity framework. Setting Seven Danish otorhinolaryngology training institutions. Participants Eighteen otorhinolaryngology residents (novices) and 11 experienced otosurgeons (experts). Intervention Residents and experienced otosurgeons each performed two to three anatomical mastoidectomies on a low-cost, 3-D-printed temporal bone model produced in-house. After drilling, mastoidectomy performances were rated by three blinded experts using a 25-item modified Welling scale (WS). Main outcome measure Validity evidence using Messick's framework including reliability assessment applying both classical test theory and Generalizability theory. Results Novices achieved a mean score of 13.9 points; experienced otosurgeons achieved 23.2 points. Using the contrasting groups method, we established a 21/25-point pass/fail level. The Generalizability coefficient was 0.91, and 75% of the score variance was attributable to participant performance, indicating a high level of assessment reliability. Subsequent D studies revealed that two raters rating one performance or one rater rating two performances were sufficiently reliable for high-stakes assessment. Conclusion Validity evidence supports using a low-cost, 3-D-printed model for mastoidectomy training. The model can be printed in-house using consumer-grade 3-D printers and serves as an additional training tool in the temporal bone curriculum. For competency-based training, we established a cut-off score of 21 of 25 WS points using the contrasting groups method.
AB - Objective 3-D printing offers convenient and low-cost mastoidectomy training; nonetheless, training benefits using 3-D-printed temporal bones remain largely unexplored. In this study, we have collected validity evidence for a low-cost, 3-D-printed temporal bone for mastoidectomy training and established a credible pass/fail score for performance on the model. Study design A prospective educational study gathering validity evidence using Messick's validity framework. Setting Seven Danish otorhinolaryngology training institutions. Participants Eighteen otorhinolaryngology residents (novices) and 11 experienced otosurgeons (experts). Intervention Residents and experienced otosurgeons each performed two to three anatomical mastoidectomies on a low-cost, 3-D-printed temporal bone model produced in-house. After drilling, mastoidectomy performances were rated by three blinded experts using a 25-item modified Welling scale (WS). Main outcome measure Validity evidence using Messick's framework including reliability assessment applying both classical test theory and Generalizability theory. Results Novices achieved a mean score of 13.9 points; experienced otosurgeons achieved 23.2 points. Using the contrasting groups method, we established a 21/25-point pass/fail level. The Generalizability coefficient was 0.91, and 75% of the score variance was attributable to participant performance, indicating a high level of assessment reliability. Subsequent D studies revealed that two raters rating one performance or one rater rating two performances were sufficiently reliable for high-stakes assessment. Conclusion Validity evidence supports using a low-cost, 3-D-printed model for mastoidectomy training. The model can be printed in-house using consumer-grade 3-D printers and serves as an additional training tool in the temporal bone curriculum. For competency-based training, we established a cut-off score of 21 of 25 WS points using the contrasting groups method.
KW - 3-D printing
KW - Additive manufacturing
KW - Assessment
KW - Mastoidectomy
KW - Medical education
KW - Neurotology
KW - Otology
KW - Rapid prototyping
KW - Surgical simulation
KW - Temporal bone
KW - Training
U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003936
DO - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003936
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37442608
AN - SCOPUS:85164843203
VL - 44
SP - e497-e503
JO - Otology & Neurotology
JF - Otology & Neurotology
SN - 1531-7129
IS - 7
ER -
ID: 368799940