2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl as a screening tool for recombinant monoterpene biosynthesis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl as a screening tool for recombinant monoterpene biosynthesis. / Behrendorff, James B.Y.H.; Vickers, Claudia E.; Chrysanthopoulos, Panagiotis; Nielsen, Lars K.

In: Microbial Cell Factories, Vol. 12, No. 1, 76, 2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Behrendorff, JBYH, Vickers, CE, Chrysanthopoulos, P & Nielsen, LK 2013, '2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl as a screening tool for recombinant monoterpene biosynthesis', Microbial Cell Factories, vol. 12, no. 1, 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-12-76

APA

Behrendorff, J. B. Y. H., Vickers, C. E., Chrysanthopoulos, P., & Nielsen, L. K. (2013). 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl as a screening tool for recombinant monoterpene biosynthesis. Microbial Cell Factories, 12(1), [76]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-12-76

Vancouver

Behrendorff JBYH, Vickers CE, Chrysanthopoulos P, Nielsen LK. 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl as a screening tool for recombinant monoterpene biosynthesis. Microbial Cell Factories. 2013;12(1). 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-12-76

Author

Behrendorff, James B.Y.H. ; Vickers, Claudia E. ; Chrysanthopoulos, Panagiotis ; Nielsen, Lars K. / 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl as a screening tool for recombinant monoterpene biosynthesis. In: Microbial Cell Factories. 2013 ; Vol. 12, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{74b6ef67e9f64601a0ee9cb348527537,
title = "2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl as a screening tool for recombinant monoterpene biosynthesis",
abstract = "Background: Monoterpenes are a class of natural C10 compounds with a range of potential applications including use as fuel additives, fragrances, and chemical feedstocks. Biosynthesis of monoterpenes in heterologous systems is yet to reach commercially-viable levels, and therefore is the subject of strain engineering and fermentation optimization studies. Detection of monoterpenes typically relies on gas chromatography/mass spectrometry; this represents a significant analytical bottleneck which limits the potential to analyse combinatorial sets of conditions. To address this, we developed a high-throughput method for pre-screening monoterpene biosynthesis.Results: An optimised DPPH assay was developed for detecting monoterpenes from two-phase microbial cultures using dodecane as the extraction solvent. The assay was useful for reproducible qualitative ranking of monoterpene concentrations, and detected standard preparations of myrcene and γ-terpinene dissolved in dodecane at concentrations as low as 10 and 15 μM, respectively, and limonene as low as 200 μM. The assay could not be used quantitatively due to technical difficulties in capturing the initial reaction rate in a multi-well plate and the presence of minor DPPH-reactive contaminants. Initially, limonene biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae was tested using two different limonene synthase enzymes and three medium compositions. The assay indicated that limonene biosynthesis was enhanced in a supplemented YP medium and that the Citrus limon limonene synthase (CLLS) was more effective than the Mentha spicata limonene synthase (MSLS). GC-MS analysis revealed that the DPPH assay had correctly identified the best limonene synthase (CLLS) and culture medium (supplemented YP medium). Because only traces of limonene were detected in SD medium, we subsequently identified medium components that improved limonene production and developed a defined medium based on these findings. The best limonene titres obtained were 1.48 ± 0.22 mg limonene per L in supplemented YP medium and 0.9 ± 0.15 mg limonene per L in a pH-adjusted supplemented SD medium.Conclusions: The DPPH assay is useful for detecting biosynthesis of limonene. Although the assay cannot be used quantitatively, it proved successful in ranking limonene production conditions qualitatively and thus is suitable as a first-tier screen. The DPPH assay will likely be applicable in detecting biosynthesis of several other monoterpenes and for screening libraries of monoterpene-producing strains.",
keywords = "2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, Antioxidant, Biosynthesis, DPPH, Isoprenoid, Limonene, Monoterpene, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Screening",
author = "Behrendorff, {James B.Y.H.} and Vickers, {Claudia E.} and Panagiotis Chrysanthopoulos and Nielsen, {Lars K.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1186/1475-2859-12-76",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Microbial Cell",
issn = "1475-2859",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl as a screening tool for recombinant monoterpene biosynthesis

AU - Behrendorff, James B.Y.H.

AU - Vickers, Claudia E.

AU - Chrysanthopoulos, Panagiotis

AU - Nielsen, Lars K.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Background: Monoterpenes are a class of natural C10 compounds with a range of potential applications including use as fuel additives, fragrances, and chemical feedstocks. Biosynthesis of monoterpenes in heterologous systems is yet to reach commercially-viable levels, and therefore is the subject of strain engineering and fermentation optimization studies. Detection of monoterpenes typically relies on gas chromatography/mass spectrometry; this represents a significant analytical bottleneck which limits the potential to analyse combinatorial sets of conditions. To address this, we developed a high-throughput method for pre-screening monoterpene biosynthesis.Results: An optimised DPPH assay was developed for detecting monoterpenes from two-phase microbial cultures using dodecane as the extraction solvent. The assay was useful for reproducible qualitative ranking of monoterpene concentrations, and detected standard preparations of myrcene and γ-terpinene dissolved in dodecane at concentrations as low as 10 and 15 μM, respectively, and limonene as low as 200 μM. The assay could not be used quantitatively due to technical difficulties in capturing the initial reaction rate in a multi-well plate and the presence of minor DPPH-reactive contaminants. Initially, limonene biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae was tested using two different limonene synthase enzymes and three medium compositions. The assay indicated that limonene biosynthesis was enhanced in a supplemented YP medium and that the Citrus limon limonene synthase (CLLS) was more effective than the Mentha spicata limonene synthase (MSLS). GC-MS analysis revealed that the DPPH assay had correctly identified the best limonene synthase (CLLS) and culture medium (supplemented YP medium). Because only traces of limonene were detected in SD medium, we subsequently identified medium components that improved limonene production and developed a defined medium based on these findings. The best limonene titres obtained were 1.48 ± 0.22 mg limonene per L in supplemented YP medium and 0.9 ± 0.15 mg limonene per L in a pH-adjusted supplemented SD medium.Conclusions: The DPPH assay is useful for detecting biosynthesis of limonene. Although the assay cannot be used quantitatively, it proved successful in ranking limonene production conditions qualitatively and thus is suitable as a first-tier screen. The DPPH assay will likely be applicable in detecting biosynthesis of several other monoterpenes and for screening libraries of monoterpene-producing strains.

AB - Background: Monoterpenes are a class of natural C10 compounds with a range of potential applications including use as fuel additives, fragrances, and chemical feedstocks. Biosynthesis of monoterpenes in heterologous systems is yet to reach commercially-viable levels, and therefore is the subject of strain engineering and fermentation optimization studies. Detection of monoterpenes typically relies on gas chromatography/mass spectrometry; this represents a significant analytical bottleneck which limits the potential to analyse combinatorial sets of conditions. To address this, we developed a high-throughput method for pre-screening monoterpene biosynthesis.Results: An optimised DPPH assay was developed for detecting monoterpenes from two-phase microbial cultures using dodecane as the extraction solvent. The assay was useful for reproducible qualitative ranking of monoterpene concentrations, and detected standard preparations of myrcene and γ-terpinene dissolved in dodecane at concentrations as low as 10 and 15 μM, respectively, and limonene as low as 200 μM. The assay could not be used quantitatively due to technical difficulties in capturing the initial reaction rate in a multi-well plate and the presence of minor DPPH-reactive contaminants. Initially, limonene biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae was tested using two different limonene synthase enzymes and three medium compositions. The assay indicated that limonene biosynthesis was enhanced in a supplemented YP medium and that the Citrus limon limonene synthase (CLLS) was more effective than the Mentha spicata limonene synthase (MSLS). GC-MS analysis revealed that the DPPH assay had correctly identified the best limonene synthase (CLLS) and culture medium (supplemented YP medium). Because only traces of limonene were detected in SD medium, we subsequently identified medium components that improved limonene production and developed a defined medium based on these findings. The best limonene titres obtained were 1.48 ± 0.22 mg limonene per L in supplemented YP medium and 0.9 ± 0.15 mg limonene per L in a pH-adjusted supplemented SD medium.Conclusions: The DPPH assay is useful for detecting biosynthesis of limonene. Although the assay cannot be used quantitatively, it proved successful in ranking limonene production conditions qualitatively and thus is suitable as a first-tier screen. The DPPH assay will likely be applicable in detecting biosynthesis of several other monoterpenes and for screening libraries of monoterpene-producing strains.

KW - 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl

KW - Antioxidant

KW - Biosynthesis

KW - DPPH

KW - Isoprenoid

KW - Limonene

KW - Monoterpene

KW - Saccharomyces cerevisiae

KW - Screening

U2 - 10.1186/1475-2859-12-76

DO - 10.1186/1475-2859-12-76

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 23968454

AN - SCOPUS:84882507458

VL - 12

JO - Microbial Cell

JF - Microbial Cell

SN - 1475-2859

IS - 1

M1 - 76

ER -

ID: 203244678