Pitkin’s Second Way: Freeing Representation Theory from Identity
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Pitkin’s Second Way: Freeing Representation Theory from Identity. / Harder, Mette Marie Staehr.
In: Representation, Vol. 56, No. 1, 1, 04.2020, p. 1-12.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Pitkin’s Second Way: Freeing Representation Theory from Identity
AU - Harder, Mette Marie Staehr
PY - 2020/4
Y1 - 2020/4
N2 - Within the last decade, sociologists as well as scholars of political culture and elections have come to conclusions that should warn us about studying political interests as something that is linked to the identity of people in a group. Yet, despite innovation within representation theory concerning the way in which we are to approach and study identity groups, representation theorists, for the mostpart, continue to conceive of interest as something that is linked to identity. This paper offers an alternative route. Reopening Pitkin’s classical approach to representation points out that her concept of substantively acting for is a dual one. Hence, it consists of acting for interests that areattached to the identity of specific people on the one hand (what I term ‘Pitkin’s first way’) and interests that exist unattached of peoples’ identity on the other (what I term ‘Pitkin’s second way’). By reclaiming this much forgotten second way and readjusting it so that it is capable of incorporating the important innovations of recent representation theory and the twenty-first century, the papercreates an opportunity for representation theorists and political actors alike, to create new distance between identity and interests.
AB - Within the last decade, sociologists as well as scholars of political culture and elections have come to conclusions that should warn us about studying political interests as something that is linked to the identity of people in a group. Yet, despite innovation within representation theory concerning the way in which we are to approach and study identity groups, representation theorists, for the mostpart, continue to conceive of interest as something that is linked to identity. This paper offers an alternative route. Reopening Pitkin’s classical approach to representation points out that her concept of substantively acting for is a dual one. Hence, it consists of acting for interests that areattached to the identity of specific people on the one hand (what I term ‘Pitkin’s first way’) and interests that exist unattached of peoples’ identity on the other (what I term ‘Pitkin’s second way’). By reclaiming this much forgotten second way and readjusting it so that it is capable of incorporating the important innovations of recent representation theory and the twenty-first century, the papercreates an opportunity for representation theorists and political actors alike, to create new distance between identity and interests.
UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2019.1636853
U2 - 10.1080/00344893.2019.1636853
DO - 10.1080/00344893.2019.1636853
M3 - Journal article
VL - 56
SP - 1
EP - 12
JO - Representation
JF - Representation
SN - 0034-4893
IS - 1
M1 - 1
ER -
ID: 330539114