The Best is Not Good Enough. Ecological (Il)literacy and the Rights of Nature in the European Union

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

The Best is Not Good Enough. Ecological (Il)literacy and the Rights of Nature in the European Union. / Hovden, Katarina.

I: Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, Bind 15, Nr. 3-4, 2018, s. 281-308.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hovden, K 2018, 'The Best is Not Good Enough. Ecological (Il)literacy and the Rights of Nature in the European Union', Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, bind 15, nr. 3-4, s. 281-308. https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01503004

APA

Hovden, K. (2018). The Best is Not Good Enough. Ecological (Il)literacy and the Rights of Nature in the European Union. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 15(3-4), 281-308. https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01503004

Vancouver

Hovden K. The Best is Not Good Enough. Ecological (Il)literacy and the Rights of Nature in the European Union. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law. 2018;15(3-4):281-308. https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01503004

Author

Hovden, Katarina. / The Best is Not Good Enough. Ecological (Il)literacy and the Rights of Nature in the European Union. I: Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law. 2018 ; Bind 15, Nr. 3-4. s. 281-308.

Bibtex

@article{b71b4723c4cb456aa8794a376fc2fc56,
title = "The Best is Not Good Enough. Ecological (Il)literacy and the Rights of Nature in the European Union",
abstract = "The Union has outlined a quasi-ecological vision for “living well, within the planet{\textquoteright}s ecological limits” in 2050. To date, there is little evidence to suggest that the Union is paving the way for realising said vision. This article introduces the ecological legal approach and the rights of nature as a manifestation of ecological law. Thereafter, it reflects on the ecological (il)literacy of the Union{\textquoteright}s approach to the sustainability crisis. Based on a civil society proposal for a Draft EU Directive on the Rights of Nature, the article offers an initial assessment of whether the rights of nature “speak to” any of the ecological shortcomings identified, and whether it might impute (elements of) ecological literacy into the Union{\textquoteright}s governance approach.",
author = "Katarina Hovden",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1163/18760104-01503004",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "281--308",
journal = "Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law",
issn = "1613-7272",
publisher = "Brill - Nijhoff",
number = "3-4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Best is Not Good Enough. Ecological (Il)literacy and the Rights of Nature in the European Union

AU - Hovden, Katarina

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The Union has outlined a quasi-ecological vision for “living well, within the planet’s ecological limits” in 2050. To date, there is little evidence to suggest that the Union is paving the way for realising said vision. This article introduces the ecological legal approach and the rights of nature as a manifestation of ecological law. Thereafter, it reflects on the ecological (il)literacy of the Union’s approach to the sustainability crisis. Based on a civil society proposal for a Draft EU Directive on the Rights of Nature, the article offers an initial assessment of whether the rights of nature “speak to” any of the ecological shortcomings identified, and whether it might impute (elements of) ecological literacy into the Union’s governance approach.

AB - The Union has outlined a quasi-ecological vision for “living well, within the planet’s ecological limits” in 2050. To date, there is little evidence to suggest that the Union is paving the way for realising said vision. This article introduces the ecological legal approach and the rights of nature as a manifestation of ecological law. Thereafter, it reflects on the ecological (il)literacy of the Union’s approach to the sustainability crisis. Based on a civil society proposal for a Draft EU Directive on the Rights of Nature, the article offers an initial assessment of whether the rights of nature “speak to” any of the ecological shortcomings identified, and whether it might impute (elements of) ecological literacy into the Union’s governance approach.

U2 - 10.1163/18760104-01503004

DO - 10.1163/18760104-01503004

M3 - Journal article

VL - 15

SP - 281

EP - 308

JO - Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law

JF - Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law

SN - 1613-7272

IS - 3-4

ER -

ID: 210316765