Topographical evolution and glaciation history of South Greenland constrained by paired 26Al/10Be nuclides

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

The pattern of cosmogenic nuclide inheritance within bedrock surfaces in previously glaciated regions can be used to assess the efficiency of glacial erosion and constrain topographic evolution. Here, we present fifty new in-situ cosmogenic 10Be and 26Al pairs in bedrock and boulder erratics from South Greenland. The data demonstrate rapid retreat of the South Greenland Ice Sheet in the early Holocene and a clear gradient in cosmogenic nuclide inheritance in bedrock with elevation. Sites <800m (exposure (m a.s.l.) above at before contrast, elevations from generally glaciation). higher in inheritance last level limited negligible no nuclide or samples sea show sites the to varies>90kyr of exposure before the last glaciation, depending on the topographic setting. Our results suggest that steering of ice into troughs led to substantial erosion (>2.6m) in the troughs over the last glacial cycle, even at elevations above 1500 m a.s.l., while bedrock on summit flats at similar elevations experienced much less erosion. Inverse Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) modelling of the nuclide inventories further indicates that selective linear erosion developed >1Myr ago at the summit flat closest to the present ice margin, and effectively limited the subsequent erosion to <2.6m. Erosion of the Redekammen Ridge some 40 km from the present ice margin was slightly more efficient over the last 1 Myr, indicating that selective linear erosion is less pronounced, or developed later, here than at the summit flats. Long-term ice-cover histories are generally less well-constrained than the erosion histories. The results suggest that the summit flats were possibly ice-covered during large parts of the last 1 Myr and experienced minimal erosion during this interval, but it is also possible that they were only covered by ice during the coldest parts of the glacial periods and that a cover of regolith or overlying rock was stripped off during one of the latest major glaciations. Although inverse modelling cannot distinguish between these scenarios, we identify the more likely ice-cover scenarios for each site based on the geological setting and surface characteristics.

Original languageEnglish
Article number116300
JournalEarth and Planetary Science Letters
Volume542
ISSN0012-821X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jul 2020

    Research areas

  • cosmogenic nuclides, deglaciation, glacial erosion, glaciation history, Greenland Ice Sheet, landscape evolution

ID: 241263653