Pharmacogenetic-Pharmacokinetic Interactions in Drug Marketing Authorization Applications via the European Medicines Agency between 2014 and 2017

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • cpt.1834

    Final published version, 832 KB, PDF document

  • Marc Maliepaard
  • Timi Toiviainen
  • Marieke L De Bruin
  • Didier Meulendijks

This study aimed to determine to which extent data on potential pharmacogenetic-pharmacokinetic (PG-PK) interactions are provided to, and assessed by, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in novel drug marketing authorization applications (MAAs), and whether regulatory assessment of PG-PK interactions is adequate or could be optimized. For this purpose, we retrospectively analyzed MAAs of small molecule drugs assessed by EMA between January 2014 and December 2017. As per two key requirements in EMA's guideline, we analyzed cases where 1) a single functionally polymorphic drug metabolizing enzyme (DME) metabolizes >25% of the drug, or 2) the drug's PK shows high interindividual variability not explained by other factors than PG. Results showed that, of 113 drugs analyzed, 53 (47%) had ≥1 functionally polymorphic DME accounting for >25% of the drug's metabolism, yielding 55 gene-drug pairs. For 36/53 (68%) of the products CYP3A4 was the major DME. Compliance with EU guidance on PG-PK issues in drug development was notably different for CYP3A4 substrates vs. non-CYP3A4 substrates. Adequate PG-PK data were provided during registration in 89% (16/18) of cases concerning non-CYP3A4 substrates, compared to 32% (12/37) of cases concerning CYP3A4 substrates. Concluding, PG-PK interactions related to non-CYP3A4 substrate drugs were in general addressed adequately in EU MAAs. PG-PK information on CYP3A4 substrates was available less frequently, despite some available evidence on the functional relevance of CYP3A4 polymorphisms. A more harmonized approach towards assessment of PG-PK issues in EU MAAs seems warranted, and a discussion on the relevance of CYP3A4 polymorphisms such as CYP3A4*22 is recommended.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Volume108
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)338-349
ISSN0009-9236
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Bibliographical note

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

ID: 239636019