Indexicality across the boundaries of syntax, semantics and pragmatics: The constructional content of the Danish free indirect object

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Standard

Indexicality across the boundaries of syntax, semantics and pragmatics : The constructional content of the Danish free indirect object. / Nielsen, Peter Juul; Heltoft, Lars.

Ditransitive Constructions in Germanic Languages : Diachronic and Synchronic Aspects. ed. / Eva Zehentner; Melanie Röthlisberger; Timothy Colleman & al. Amsterdam : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2023. p. 150-194 (Studies in Germanic Linguistics; No. 7).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Nielsen, PJ & Heltoft, L 2023, Indexicality across the boundaries of syntax, semantics and pragmatics: The constructional content of the Danish free indirect object. in E Zehentner, M Röthlisberger & T Colleman & al. (eds), Ditransitive Constructions in Germanic Languages : Diachronic and Synchronic Aspects. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Studies in Germanic Linguistics, no. 7, pp. 150-194. https://doi.org/10.1075/sigl.7.05nie

APA

Nielsen, P. J., & Heltoft, L. (2023). Indexicality across the boundaries of syntax, semantics and pragmatics: The constructional content of the Danish free indirect object. In E. Zehentner, M. Röthlisberger, & T. Colleman & al. (Eds.), Ditransitive Constructions in Germanic Languages : Diachronic and Synchronic Aspects (pp. 150-194). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Studies in Germanic Linguistics No. 7 https://doi.org/10.1075/sigl.7.05nie

Vancouver

Nielsen PJ, Heltoft L. Indexicality across the boundaries of syntax, semantics and pragmatics: The constructional content of the Danish free indirect object. In Zehentner E, Röthlisberger M, Colleman & al. T, editors, Ditransitive Constructions in Germanic Languages : Diachronic and Synchronic Aspects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 2023. p. 150-194. (Studies in Germanic Linguistics; No. 7). https://doi.org/10.1075/sigl.7.05nie

Author

Nielsen, Peter Juul ; Heltoft, Lars. / Indexicality across the boundaries of syntax, semantics and pragmatics : The constructional content of the Danish free indirect object. Ditransitive Constructions in Germanic Languages : Diachronic and Synchronic Aspects. editor / Eva Zehentner ; Melanie Röthlisberger ; Timothy Colleman & al. Amsterdam : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2023. pp. 150-194 (Studies in Germanic Linguistics; No. 7).

Bibtex

@inbook{302320000b364f3ab93dfe36f7595980,
title = "Indexicality across the boundaries of syntax, semantics and pragmatics: The constructional content of the Danish free indirect object",
abstract = "n Danish, indirect object (IO) constructions fall into two main classes: (1) the three-argument valence-governed pattern and (2) the free indirect object construction. The free IO is a constructional extension to certain types of monotransitive constructions and verbs; by contrast, the valencegoverned IO is a manifestation of the third argument of three-place verb stems in (prototypically) transfer constructions. The free indirect object (free IO) in Modern Danish presents an intricate problem, calling for concepts and solutions not normally connected with constructional syntax. Its frequency is extremely low, and intuitions about its acceptability varyaccording to basic speech act type. In assertive contexts, it comes across as old-fashioned and is hardly productive; in regulative contexts, by contrast, it retains full productivity. The few positive results yielded by a corpus search are almost exclusively examples of free IOs in regulative contexts. Indexicality, as used especially in morphology by Henning Andersen and Raimo Anttila, is the key concept of our analysis. An IO NP must identify its argument by pointing indexically to some aspect of the predicate{\textquoteright}s semantics, but since – in the case of free IOs – there is no third argument A3 in the verb{\textquoteright}s valence schema, there is apparently nothing for the free IO to index. In special cases, however, most importantly in regulative contexts, the free IO finds an alternative indicatum by pointing to features of the performative situation. Our findings indicate the need for a grammatical theory that allows syntactic rules to be not only semantically, but also pragmatically sensitive.",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, Construction, free indirect object, indexical meaning, valence, speech acts, reflexive pronoun, symbolic meaning, indirect object constructions, constructional meaning, free indirect object, indexical meaning, valence, speech acts, reflexive morpheme, regulative speech acts, symbolic meaning",
author = "Nielsen, {Peter Juul} and Lars Heltoft",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1075/sigl.7.05nie",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789027213914",
series = "Studies in Germanic Linguistics",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "7",
pages = "150--194",
editor = "Eva Zehentner and Melanie R{\"o}thlisberger and {Colleman & al.}, Timothy",
booktitle = "Ditransitive Constructions in Germanic Languages",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Indexicality across the boundaries of syntax, semantics and pragmatics

T2 - The constructional content of the Danish free indirect object

AU - Nielsen, Peter Juul

AU - Heltoft, Lars

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - n Danish, indirect object (IO) constructions fall into two main classes: (1) the three-argument valence-governed pattern and (2) the free indirect object construction. The free IO is a constructional extension to certain types of monotransitive constructions and verbs; by contrast, the valencegoverned IO is a manifestation of the third argument of three-place verb stems in (prototypically) transfer constructions. The free indirect object (free IO) in Modern Danish presents an intricate problem, calling for concepts and solutions not normally connected with constructional syntax. Its frequency is extremely low, and intuitions about its acceptability varyaccording to basic speech act type. In assertive contexts, it comes across as old-fashioned and is hardly productive; in regulative contexts, by contrast, it retains full productivity. The few positive results yielded by a corpus search are almost exclusively examples of free IOs in regulative contexts. Indexicality, as used especially in morphology by Henning Andersen and Raimo Anttila, is the key concept of our analysis. An IO NP must identify its argument by pointing indexically to some aspect of the predicate’s semantics, but since – in the case of free IOs – there is no third argument A3 in the verb’s valence schema, there is apparently nothing for the free IO to index. In special cases, however, most importantly in regulative contexts, the free IO finds an alternative indicatum by pointing to features of the performative situation. Our findings indicate the need for a grammatical theory that allows syntactic rules to be not only semantically, but also pragmatically sensitive.

AB - n Danish, indirect object (IO) constructions fall into two main classes: (1) the three-argument valence-governed pattern and (2) the free indirect object construction. The free IO is a constructional extension to certain types of monotransitive constructions and verbs; by contrast, the valencegoverned IO is a manifestation of the third argument of three-place verb stems in (prototypically) transfer constructions. The free indirect object (free IO) in Modern Danish presents an intricate problem, calling for concepts and solutions not normally connected with constructional syntax. Its frequency is extremely low, and intuitions about its acceptability varyaccording to basic speech act type. In assertive contexts, it comes across as old-fashioned and is hardly productive; in regulative contexts, by contrast, it retains full productivity. The few positive results yielded by a corpus search are almost exclusively examples of free IOs in regulative contexts. Indexicality, as used especially in morphology by Henning Andersen and Raimo Anttila, is the key concept of our analysis. An IO NP must identify its argument by pointing indexically to some aspect of the predicate’s semantics, but since – in the case of free IOs – there is no third argument A3 in the verb’s valence schema, there is apparently nothing for the free IO to index. In special cases, however, most importantly in regulative contexts, the free IO finds an alternative indicatum by pointing to features of the performative situation. Our findings indicate the need for a grammatical theory that allows syntactic rules to be not only semantically, but also pragmatically sensitive.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - Construction, free indirect object, indexical meaning, valence, speech acts, reflexive pronoun, symbolic meaning

KW - indirect object constructions, constructional meaning, free indirect object, indexical meaning, valence, speech acts, reflexive morpheme, regulative speech acts, symbolic meaning

U2 - 10.1075/sigl.7.05nie

DO - 10.1075/sigl.7.05nie

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9789027213914

T3 - Studies in Germanic Linguistics

SP - 150

EP - 194

BT - Ditransitive Constructions in Germanic Languages

A2 - Zehentner, Eva

A2 - Röthlisberger, Melanie

A2 - Colleman & al., Timothy

PB - John Benjamins Publishing Company

CY - Amsterdam

ER -

ID: 226498337