Do intermediary institutions promote inclusiveness in PES programs? The case of Costa Rica

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Standard

Do intermediary institutions promote inclusiveness in PES programs? The case of Costa Rica. / Bosselmann, Aske Skovmand; Lund, Jens Friis.

In: Geoforum, Vol. 49, 2013, p. 50-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Bosselmann, AS & Lund, JF 2013, 'Do intermediary institutions promote inclusiveness in PES programs? The case of Costa Rica', Geoforum, vol. 49, pp. 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.05.009

APA

Bosselmann, A. S., & Lund, J. F. (2013). Do intermediary institutions promote inclusiveness in PES programs? The case of Costa Rica. Geoforum, 49, 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.05.009

Vancouver

Bosselmann AS, Lund JF. Do intermediary institutions promote inclusiveness in PES programs? The case of Costa Rica. Geoforum. 2013;49:50-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.05.009

Author

Bosselmann, Aske Skovmand ; Lund, Jens Friis. / Do intermediary institutions promote inclusiveness in PES programs? The case of Costa Rica. In: Geoforum. 2013 ; Vol. 49. pp. 50-60.

Bibtex

@article{1a26fa3665bf4075a2a77f51a82e6968,
title = "Do intermediary institutions promote inclusiveness in PES programs? The case of Costa Rica",
abstract = "Payments for environmental services (PES) are often promoted on the basis of a purported win–win scenario in terms of accomplishing dual environmental and social policy objectives. Yet, it has been observed that PES programs tend to exclude small land-owners due to relatively high and largely scale-independent transaction costs. This study seeks to shed light on the role of local intermediaries in PES programs and how they may bring the reality of PES closer to the win–win scenario. This is done through an investigation of three intermediaries in the Costa Rican PES program; an NGO, a producer cooperative, and a county agricultural center. Based on interviews, household surveys, and reviews of PES contracts, the study examines differences in the inclusion of small-holders in the PES program between the three organizations and focuses on understanding the underlying reasons for any observed differences. The results reveal that the cooperative and the agricultural center are more inclusive of small-holders than the NGO. The ability to include small-holders is influenced by the organizations{\textquoteright} level of running operational costs, but also by their pre-existing portfolio of activities and relationships with landowners, as well as the land development history of the local area. Finally, the role of intermediaries is highly influenced by the framing of their working conditions by the PES program. This study thus shows the importance of considering the factors that condition the role of intermediaries in securing inclusive and low-cost provision of ES.",
keywords = "???Politik, lov og forvaltning vedr. naturressourcer???, Payments for ecosystem services, ???Ulande og milj{\o}???, ???Skov{\o}konomi og -politik???",
author = "Bosselmann, {Aske Skovmand} and Lund, {Jens Friis}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.05.009",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "50--60",
journal = "Geoforum",
issn = "0016-7185",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do intermediary institutions promote inclusiveness in PES programs? The case of Costa Rica

AU - Bosselmann, Aske Skovmand

AU - Lund, Jens Friis

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Payments for environmental services (PES) are often promoted on the basis of a purported win–win scenario in terms of accomplishing dual environmental and social policy objectives. Yet, it has been observed that PES programs tend to exclude small land-owners due to relatively high and largely scale-independent transaction costs. This study seeks to shed light on the role of local intermediaries in PES programs and how they may bring the reality of PES closer to the win–win scenario. This is done through an investigation of three intermediaries in the Costa Rican PES program; an NGO, a producer cooperative, and a county agricultural center. Based on interviews, household surveys, and reviews of PES contracts, the study examines differences in the inclusion of small-holders in the PES program between the three organizations and focuses on understanding the underlying reasons for any observed differences. The results reveal that the cooperative and the agricultural center are more inclusive of small-holders than the NGO. The ability to include small-holders is influenced by the organizations’ level of running operational costs, but also by their pre-existing portfolio of activities and relationships with landowners, as well as the land development history of the local area. Finally, the role of intermediaries is highly influenced by the framing of their working conditions by the PES program. This study thus shows the importance of considering the factors that condition the role of intermediaries in securing inclusive and low-cost provision of ES.

AB - Payments for environmental services (PES) are often promoted on the basis of a purported win–win scenario in terms of accomplishing dual environmental and social policy objectives. Yet, it has been observed that PES programs tend to exclude small land-owners due to relatively high and largely scale-independent transaction costs. This study seeks to shed light on the role of local intermediaries in PES programs and how they may bring the reality of PES closer to the win–win scenario. This is done through an investigation of three intermediaries in the Costa Rican PES program; an NGO, a producer cooperative, and a county agricultural center. Based on interviews, household surveys, and reviews of PES contracts, the study examines differences in the inclusion of small-holders in the PES program between the three organizations and focuses on understanding the underlying reasons for any observed differences. The results reveal that the cooperative and the agricultural center are more inclusive of small-holders than the NGO. The ability to include small-holders is influenced by the organizations’ level of running operational costs, but also by their pre-existing portfolio of activities and relationships with landowners, as well as the land development history of the local area. Finally, the role of intermediaries is highly influenced by the framing of their working conditions by the PES program. This study thus shows the importance of considering the factors that condition the role of intermediaries in securing inclusive and low-cost provision of ES.

KW - ???Politik, lov og forvaltning vedr. naturressourcer???

KW - Payments for ecosystem services

KW - ???Ulande og miljø???

KW - ???Skovøkonomi og -politik???

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.05.009

DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.05.009

M3 - Journal article

VL - 49

SP - 50

EP - 60

JO - Geoforum

JF - Geoforum

SN - 0016-7185

ER -

ID: 46409856