Communities and Values: Dietrich von Hildebrand’s social ontology

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Standard

Communities and Values : Dietrich von Hildebrand’s social ontology. / Salice, Alessandro.

The Phenomenological Approach to Social Reality: History, Concepts, Problems. ed. / Alessandro Salice; Hans Bernhard Schmid. Cham : Springer, 2016. p. 237-257 (Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality, Vol. 6).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Salice, A 2016, Communities and Values: Dietrich von Hildebrand’s social ontology. in A Salice & HB Schmid (eds), The Phenomenological Approach to Social Reality: History, Concepts, Problems. Springer, Cham, Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality, vol. 6, pp. 237-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27692-2_11

APA

Salice, A. (2016). Communities and Values: Dietrich von Hildebrand’s social ontology. In A. Salice, & H. B. Schmid (Eds.), The Phenomenological Approach to Social Reality: History, Concepts, Problems (pp. 237-257). Springer. Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality Vol. 6 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27692-2_11

Vancouver

Salice A. Communities and Values: Dietrich von Hildebrand’s social ontology. In Salice A, Schmid HB, editors, The Phenomenological Approach to Social Reality: History, Concepts, Problems. Cham: Springer. 2016. p. 237-257. (Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality, Vol. 6). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27692-2_11

Author

Salice, Alessandro. / Communities and Values : Dietrich von Hildebrand’s social ontology. The Phenomenological Approach to Social Reality: History, Concepts, Problems. editor / Alessandro Salice ; Hans Bernhard Schmid. Cham : Springer, 2016. pp. 237-257 (Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality, Vol. 6).

Bibtex

@inbook{42f2ecb130714420a6cb2c6d25b31e5b,
title = "Communities and Values: Dietrich von Hildebrand{\textquoteright}s social ontology",
abstract = "Within the debate on the ontology of social groups, a prominent view holds that, if one wants to know what a group is and how a group is created or constituted, one has to look at the internal or subjective conditions that either the group{\textquoteright}s members or the group as such have to fulfill. This idea is clearly illustrated by a by now rather standard approach to we-ness, which seeks to locate this property either in the subject of a given attitude (which, most perspicuously, is used to being characterized as an intention), or in the mode of the attitude or in its content. This view also suggests that there is one prototypical notion of group which conceptually has to be traced back to one of the three constituents of an intentional attitude and that the main way to access the notion of a group is by means of the concept of intention and/or intentional action.The present paper tackles a fairly divergent approach to the ontology of groups put forward by Dietrich von Hildebrand in his book on the Metaphysics of Community. First, von Hildebrand argues that there are different kinds of social groups and that, accordingly, individuals can be {\textquoteleft}together{\textquoteright} in radically different ways. In particular, he substantially weakens the relevance that contemporary debate ascribes to the notion of shared intention and shared agency. Said another way, the existence of groups does not necessarily require their members to intend to do something together and to act according to this intention. Especially when it comes to communities (understood as a specific kind of group), he suggests a – within social ontology so far relatively unexplored – principle of constitution: instead of looking for the internal and subjective conditions that regulate the group{\textquoteright}s constitution, he rather stresses an external one, i.e., the “virtus unitiva” or the unifying virtue that values can exert over individuals and which might bring them to constitute a group.",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, communities, values, social ontology, Dietrich von Hildebrand, group personhood",
author = "Alessandro Salice",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-27692-2_11",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-27691-5",
series = "Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "237--257",
editor = "Alessandro Salice and Schmid, {Hans Bernhard}",
booktitle = "The Phenomenological Approach to Social Reality",
address = "Switzerland",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Communities and Values

T2 - Dietrich von Hildebrand’s social ontology

AU - Salice, Alessandro

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Within the debate on the ontology of social groups, a prominent view holds that, if one wants to know what a group is and how a group is created or constituted, one has to look at the internal or subjective conditions that either the group’s members or the group as such have to fulfill. This idea is clearly illustrated by a by now rather standard approach to we-ness, which seeks to locate this property either in the subject of a given attitude (which, most perspicuously, is used to being characterized as an intention), or in the mode of the attitude or in its content. This view also suggests that there is one prototypical notion of group which conceptually has to be traced back to one of the three constituents of an intentional attitude and that the main way to access the notion of a group is by means of the concept of intention and/or intentional action.The present paper tackles a fairly divergent approach to the ontology of groups put forward by Dietrich von Hildebrand in his book on the Metaphysics of Community. First, von Hildebrand argues that there are different kinds of social groups and that, accordingly, individuals can be ‘together’ in radically different ways. In particular, he substantially weakens the relevance that contemporary debate ascribes to the notion of shared intention and shared agency. Said another way, the existence of groups does not necessarily require their members to intend to do something together and to act according to this intention. Especially when it comes to communities (understood as a specific kind of group), he suggests a – within social ontology so far relatively unexplored – principle of constitution: instead of looking for the internal and subjective conditions that regulate the group’s constitution, he rather stresses an external one, i.e., the “virtus unitiva” or the unifying virtue that values can exert over individuals and which might bring them to constitute a group.

AB - Within the debate on the ontology of social groups, a prominent view holds that, if one wants to know what a group is and how a group is created or constituted, one has to look at the internal or subjective conditions that either the group’s members or the group as such have to fulfill. This idea is clearly illustrated by a by now rather standard approach to we-ness, which seeks to locate this property either in the subject of a given attitude (which, most perspicuously, is used to being characterized as an intention), or in the mode of the attitude or in its content. This view also suggests that there is one prototypical notion of group which conceptually has to be traced back to one of the three constituents of an intentional attitude and that the main way to access the notion of a group is by means of the concept of intention and/or intentional action.The present paper tackles a fairly divergent approach to the ontology of groups put forward by Dietrich von Hildebrand in his book on the Metaphysics of Community. First, von Hildebrand argues that there are different kinds of social groups and that, accordingly, individuals can be ‘together’ in radically different ways. In particular, he substantially weakens the relevance that contemporary debate ascribes to the notion of shared intention and shared agency. Said another way, the existence of groups does not necessarily require their members to intend to do something together and to act according to this intention. Especially when it comes to communities (understood as a specific kind of group), he suggests a – within social ontology so far relatively unexplored – principle of constitution: instead of looking for the internal and subjective conditions that regulate the group’s constitution, he rather stresses an external one, i.e., the “virtus unitiva” or the unifying virtue that values can exert over individuals and which might bring them to constitute a group.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - communities

KW - values

KW - social ontology

KW - Dietrich von Hildebrand

KW - group personhood

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-27692-2_11

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-27692-2_11

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 978-3-319-27691-5

T3 - Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality

SP - 237

EP - 257

BT - The Phenomenological Approach to Social Reality

A2 - Salice, Alessandro

A2 - Schmid, Hans Bernhard

PB - Springer

CY - Cham

ER -

ID: 132509492