TY - CHAP

T1 - Churchification of Islam in Europe

AU - Vinding, Niels Valdemar

N1 - Niels Valdemar Vinding, PhD (2013), University of Copenhagen, is Assistant Professor researching on Islam in Europe and European Muslim institutions. Currently, his focus is on ‘Imams of the West’ and the authority and leadership challenges amongst Muslims.

PY - 2018/3/12

Y1 - 2018/3/12

N2 - This chapter explores the concept of churchification in relation toIslam and Muslim organisations in Europe. The first part of the article surveys the word in variations, the phenomenon it describes and different observations of this phenomenon across a number of European contexts by a selection of European scholars on Islam in Europe. After the initial observations and conceptualisations of churchification and after discussing the promising institutionalist theories follows a process of analytical distinction into four closely related but distinguishable logics of churchification. Firstly, churchification is understood as pedagogical, analogical or rhetorical usages comparing mosques to churches, or imams to priests, and so on. Secondly, churchification as normativisation is identified, which maintains that mosques should or ought to function like the churches, imams should act like priests, and that for a number of politically or ideologically motivated reasons. Thirdly, churchification can be identified in terms of structural and implicit hegemony emanating from the established paradigms of church and state relations, or from the churches themselves. Here, the sheer positional power and presence of the churches in Europe makes it almost impossible to avoid an influence on Islam and Muslim organisations. Fourthly and finally, churchification can be seen as a deliberate neo-institutionalist isomorphic strategy – or counter-strategy – where Muslim organisations and institutions deliberately model themselves on the church either because they are structurally coerced to do so, because it raises standards or because doing so is smart and cost-efficient. Equally, there are Muslim organisations and communities who move in the opposite direct, exactly because they want to distance and distinguish themselves from European churches, priesthood, theology, and institutional expectations. This often proves to be a more difficult strategy and although tempting isomorphic institutionalisation might not yield the hoped outcome of resource mobilisation,acceptance or recognition for Muslims in the European context.

AB - This chapter explores the concept of churchification in relation toIslam and Muslim organisations in Europe. The first part of the article surveys the word in variations, the phenomenon it describes and different observations of this phenomenon across a number of European contexts by a selection of European scholars on Islam in Europe. After the initial observations and conceptualisations of churchification and after discussing the promising institutionalist theories follows a process of analytical distinction into four closely related but distinguishable logics of churchification. Firstly, churchification is understood as pedagogical, analogical or rhetorical usages comparing mosques to churches, or imams to priests, and so on. Secondly, churchification as normativisation is identified, which maintains that mosques should or ought to function like the churches, imams should act like priests, and that for a number of politically or ideologically motivated reasons. Thirdly, churchification can be identified in terms of structural and implicit hegemony emanating from the established paradigms of church and state relations, or from the churches themselves. Here, the sheer positional power and presence of the churches in Europe makes it almost impossible to avoid an influence on Islam and Muslim organisations. Fourthly and finally, churchification can be seen as a deliberate neo-institutionalist isomorphic strategy – or counter-strategy – where Muslim organisations and institutions deliberately model themselves on the church either because they are structurally coerced to do so, because it raises standards or because doing so is smart and cost-efficient. Equally, there are Muslim organisations and communities who move in the opposite direct, exactly because they want to distance and distinguish themselves from European churches, priesthood, theology, and institutional expectations. This often proves to be a more difficult strategy and although tempting isomorphic institutionalisation might not yield the hoped outcome of resource mobilisation,acceptance or recognition for Muslims in the European context.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - Churchification

KW - Church and Islam

KW - Christianity and Islam

KW - Islam and Muslims

KW - Islam and Muslims in Europe

KW - Sociology of Religion

KW - Church

KW - Islam

KW - Muslims

U2 - 10.1163/9789004362529_005

DO - 10.1163/9789004362529_005

M3 - Book chapter

T3 - Muslim Minorities

SP - 50

EP - 66

BT - Exploring the Multitude of Muslims in Europe. Essays in Honour of Jørgen S. Nielsen

PB - Brill

ER -