Overcoming the legal Iron curtain: Similarities and dissimilarities in the use of preliminary references betweennew and old Member States

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review

Standard

Overcoming the legal Iron curtain : Similarities and dissimilarities in the use of preliminary references betweennew and old Member States. / Mayoral, Juan A.

Dealing with EU law: The role of the national courts in interpretation and application of European Union law. ed. / Mihai Sandru; Giuseppe Martinico; Mihai Banu. Bucuresti : Editura Universitara, 2013. p. 60-85.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Mayoral, JA 2013, Overcoming the legal Iron curtain: Similarities and dissimilarities in the use of preliminary references betweennew and old Member States. in M Sandru, G Martinico & M Banu (eds), Dealing with EU law: The role of the national courts in interpretation and application of European Union law. Editura Universitara, Bucuresti, pp. 60-85.

APA

Mayoral, J. A. (2013). Overcoming the legal Iron curtain: Similarities and dissimilarities in the use of preliminary references betweennew and old Member States. In M. Sandru, G. Martinico, & M. Banu (Eds.), Dealing with EU law: The role of the national courts in interpretation and application of European Union law (pp. 60-85). Editura Universitara.

Vancouver

Mayoral JA. Overcoming the legal Iron curtain: Similarities and dissimilarities in the use of preliminary references betweennew and old Member States. In Sandru M, Martinico G, Banu M, editors, Dealing with EU law: The role of the national courts in interpretation and application of European Union law. Bucuresti: Editura Universitara. 2013. p. 60-85

Author

Mayoral, Juan A. / Overcoming the legal Iron curtain : Similarities and dissimilarities in the use of preliminary references betweennew and old Member States. Dealing with EU law: The role of the national courts in interpretation and application of European Union law. editor / Mihai Sandru ; Giuseppe Martinico ; Mihai Banu. Bucuresti : Editura Universitara, 2013. pp. 60-85

Bibtex

@inbook{d2dfbc105dca45de888893848fd943c1,
title = "Overcoming the legal Iron curtain: Similarities and dissimilarities in the use of preliminary references betweennew and old Member States",
abstract = "This chapter analyses the determinants that lead national courts across EU countriesto use the preliminary reference procedure, paying special attention to the differences andsimilarities in the use of this mechanism of judicial cooperation between the old and thenew Member States incorporated in 2004 and 2007. The study presents original andcomprehensive data on the use of preliminary references (1961-2011) in all 27 Memberstates. Besides confirming the impact of common factors already tested in the literature,this research additionally identifies some differences in the institutional dynamicsinfluencing the use of preliminary references across older and newer Member States.",
keywords = "Faculty of Law, Preliminary references, National Courts, Court of Justice of the European Union, New and Old Member States, CJEU",
author = "Mayoral, {Juan A.}",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-606-591-749-1",
pages = "60--85",
editor = "Mihai Sandru and Giuseppe Martinico and Mihai Banu",
booktitle = "Dealing with EU law",
publisher = "Editura Universitara",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Overcoming the legal Iron curtain

T2 - Similarities and dissimilarities in the use of preliminary references betweennew and old Member States

AU - Mayoral, Juan A.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This chapter analyses the determinants that lead national courts across EU countriesto use the preliminary reference procedure, paying special attention to the differences andsimilarities in the use of this mechanism of judicial cooperation between the old and thenew Member States incorporated in 2004 and 2007. The study presents original andcomprehensive data on the use of preliminary references (1961-2011) in all 27 Memberstates. Besides confirming the impact of common factors already tested in the literature,this research additionally identifies some differences in the institutional dynamicsinfluencing the use of preliminary references across older and newer Member States.

AB - This chapter analyses the determinants that lead national courts across EU countriesto use the preliminary reference procedure, paying special attention to the differences andsimilarities in the use of this mechanism of judicial cooperation between the old and thenew Member States incorporated in 2004 and 2007. The study presents original andcomprehensive data on the use of preliminary references (1961-2011) in all 27 Memberstates. Besides confirming the impact of common factors already tested in the literature,this research additionally identifies some differences in the institutional dynamicsinfluencing the use of preliminary references across older and newer Member States.

KW - Faculty of Law

KW - Preliminary references

KW - National Courts

KW - Court of Justice of the European Union

KW - New and Old Member States

KW - CJEU

UR - http://www.editurauniversitara.ro/carte/carti_in_curs_de_aparitie/dealing_with_eu_law_the_role_of_national_courts_in_the_interpretation_and_application_of_european_union_law/10623

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 978-606-591-749-1

SP - 60

EP - 85

BT - Dealing with EU law

A2 - Sandru, Mihai

A2 - Martinico, Giuseppe

A2 - Banu, Mihai

PB - Editura Universitara

CY - Bucuresti

ER -

ID: 156429653