Standard
Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary. / Rytter, Jens Elo.
Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review. ed. / Fiona de Londras; Fergal F. Davis. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2014. p. 56-74.
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
Harvard
Rytter, JE 2014,
Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary. in F de Londras & FF Davis (eds),
Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 56-74.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107282124.004
APA
Rytter, J. E. (2014).
Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary. In F. de Londras, & F. F. Davis (Eds.),
Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review (pp. 56-74). Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107282124.004
Vancouver
Rytter JE.
Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary. In de Londras F, Davis FF, editors, Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2014. p. 56-74
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107282124.004
Author
Rytter, Jens Elo. / Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary. Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review. editor / Fiona de Londras ; Fergal F. Davis. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2014. pp. 56-74
Bibtex
@inbook{17c9014171f848a497860331a7579346,
title = "Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary",
abstract = "The article analyses recent Danish case law on counter-terrorism measures to ascertain the extent to which a tradiitonally weak judiciary like the Danish one performs a real review. The conclusion is that the review is real, but measured.",
keywords = "Faculty of Law, domstolskontrol, terrorisme , danmark",
author = "Rytter, {Jens Elo}",
year = "2014",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781107282124.004",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781107053618",
pages = "56--74",
editor = "{de Londras}, Fiona and Davis, {Fergal F. }",
booktitle = "Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary
AU - Rytter, Jens Elo
PY - 2014/10/1
Y1 - 2014/10/1
N2 - The article analyses recent Danish case law on counter-terrorism measures to ascertain the extent to which a tradiitonally weak judiciary like the Danish one performs a real review. The conclusion is that the review is real, but measured.
AB - The article analyses recent Danish case law on counter-terrorism measures to ascertain the extent to which a tradiitonally weak judiciary like the Danish one performs a real review. The conclusion is that the review is real, but measured.
KW - Faculty of Law
KW - domstolskontrol
KW - terrorisme
KW - danmark
U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781107282124.004
DO - 10.1017/CBO9781107282124.004
M3 - Book chapter
SN - 9781107053618
SN - 9781107662964
SP - 56
EP - 74
BT - Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review
A2 - de Londras, Fiona
A2 - Davis, Fergal F.
PB - Cambridge University Press
CY - Cambridge
ER -
