“Sleeping Beauty”: The Right to Science as a Global Ethical Discourse

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

“Sleeping Beauty”: The Right to Science as a Global Ethical Discourse. / Mann, Sebastian Porsdam; Porsdam, Helle; Donders, Yvonne.

I: Human Rights Quarterly, Bind 42, Nr. 2, 2020, s. 332–356.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Mann, SP, Porsdam, H & Donders, Y 2020, '“Sleeping Beauty”: The Right to Science as a Global Ethical Discourse', Human Rights Quarterly, bind 42, nr. 2, s. 332–356. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2020.0020

APA

Mann, S. P., Porsdam, H., & Donders, Y. (2020). “Sleeping Beauty”: The Right to Science as a Global Ethical Discourse. Human Rights Quarterly, 42(2), 332–356. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2020.0020

Vancouver

Mann SP, Porsdam H, Donders Y. “Sleeping Beauty”: The Right to Science as a Global Ethical Discourse. Human Rights Quarterly. 2020;42(2):332–356. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2020.0020

Author

Mann, Sebastian Porsdam ; Porsdam, Helle ; Donders, Yvonne. / “Sleeping Beauty”: The Right to Science as a Global Ethical Discourse. I: Human Rights Quarterly. 2020 ; Bind 42, Nr. 2. s. 332–356.

Bibtex

@article{0d1369a2c6f14e878df87d037cb0ff82,
title = "“Sleeping Beauty”: The Right to Science as a Global Ethical Discourse",
abstract = "Everyone has a human right to science (RtS), as enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Despite its significance for scientists and society, this right has not received the attention it deserves. To remedy this, theUnited Nations called for input from academic and scientific communities in 2009. Its Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is currently drafting a General Comment—a document of authoritative guidance to state parties on the normative contents of the RtS. The scientific community is therefore in a unique position to influence how this right is elucidated within a human rights context. Informed by a systematic review of the relevant literature, we first explore the history, importance, and content of the RtS. We then examine a few important topics that fall within the remit of the RtS but were absent or inadequately addressed in the extant literature, and conclude by discussing the implications of the RtS for science policy.",
author = "Mann, {Sebastian Porsdam} and Helle Porsdam and Yvonne Donders",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1353/hrq.2020.0020",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "332–356",
journal = "Human Rights Quarterly",
issn = "0275-0392",
publisher = "TheJohns Hopkins University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Sleeping Beauty”: The Right to Science as a Global Ethical Discourse

AU - Mann, Sebastian Porsdam

AU - Porsdam, Helle

AU - Donders, Yvonne

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Everyone has a human right to science (RtS), as enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Despite its significance for scientists and society, this right has not received the attention it deserves. To remedy this, theUnited Nations called for input from academic and scientific communities in 2009. Its Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is currently drafting a General Comment—a document of authoritative guidance to state parties on the normative contents of the RtS. The scientific community is therefore in a unique position to influence how this right is elucidated within a human rights context. Informed by a systematic review of the relevant literature, we first explore the history, importance, and content of the RtS. We then examine a few important topics that fall within the remit of the RtS but were absent or inadequately addressed in the extant literature, and conclude by discussing the implications of the RtS for science policy.

AB - Everyone has a human right to science (RtS), as enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Despite its significance for scientists and society, this right has not received the attention it deserves. To remedy this, theUnited Nations called for input from academic and scientific communities in 2009. Its Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is currently drafting a General Comment—a document of authoritative guidance to state parties on the normative contents of the RtS. The scientific community is therefore in a unique position to influence how this right is elucidated within a human rights context. Informed by a systematic review of the relevant literature, we first explore the history, importance, and content of the RtS. We then examine a few important topics that fall within the remit of the RtS but were absent or inadequately addressed in the extant literature, and conclude by discussing the implications of the RtS for science policy.

U2 - 10.1353/hrq.2020.0020

DO - 10.1353/hrq.2020.0020

M3 - Journal article

VL - 42

SP - 332

EP - 356

JO - Human Rights Quarterly

JF - Human Rights Quarterly

SN - 0275-0392

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 241943483