The Security Council's Methods of Work: The Borderlines of Legality

Publikation: Konferencebidrag › Paper › Forskning

Standard

The Security Council's Methods of Work: The Borderlines of Legality. / Cullen, Miriam.

2015.

Publikation: Konferencebidrag › Paper › Forskning

Harvard

Cullen, M 2015, 'The Security Council's Methods of Work: The Borderlines of Legality'.

APA

Cullen, M. (2015). The Security Council's Methods of Work: The Borderlines of Legality.

Vancouver

Cullen M. The Security Council's Methods of Work: The Borderlines of Legality. 2015.

Author

Cullen, Miriam. / The Security Council's Methods of Work: The Borderlines of Legality. 20 s.

Bibtex

@conference{48173432e7394f84868cc71c9895aca3,
title = "The Security Council's Methods of Work: The Borderlines of Legality",
abstract = "The first section outlines the Security Council{\textquoteright}s rules of procedure (or lack thereof) and working methods. Examples are used to illustrate that the Council's methods of work have, paradoxically, become increasingly opaque at the same time as its direct involvement in international justice has escalated. The paper concludes by positing that a lack of procedural fairness in the Council{\textquoteright}s methods of work at least undermines the justice imperative that the Council so espouses and at most violates an ancillary legal obligation.",
author = "Miriam Cullen",
year = "2015",
month = jun,
language = "English",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - The Security Council's Methods of Work: The Borderlines of Legality

AU - Cullen, Miriam

PY - 2015/6

Y1 - 2015/6

N2 - The first section outlines the Security Council’s rules of procedure (or lack thereof) and working methods. Examples are used to illustrate that the Council's methods of work have, paradoxically, become increasingly opaque at the same time as its direct involvement in international justice has escalated. The paper concludes by positing that a lack of procedural fairness in the Council’s methods of work at least undermines the justice imperative that the Council so espouses and at most violates an ancillary legal obligation.

AB - The first section outlines the Security Council’s rules of procedure (or lack thereof) and working methods. Examples are used to illustrate that the Council's methods of work have, paradoxically, become increasingly opaque at the same time as its direct involvement in international justice has escalated. The paper concludes by positing that a lack of procedural fairness in the Council’s methods of work at least undermines the justice imperative that the Council so espouses and at most violates an ancillary legal obligation.

M3 - Paper

ER -

ID: 169607198