The judiciary of international criminal law: Double decline and practical turn

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Standard

The judiciary of international criminal law : Double decline and practical turn. / Christensen, Mikkel Jarle.

I: Journal of International Criminal Justice, Bind 17, Nr. 3, 2019, s. 537-555.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Christensen, MJ 2019, 'The judiciary of international criminal law: Double decline and practical turn', Journal of International Criminal Justice, bind 17, nr. 3, s. 537-555. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqz033

APA

Christensen, M. J. (2019). The judiciary of international criminal law: Double decline and practical turn. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 17(3), 537-555. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqz033

Vancouver

Christensen MJ. The judiciary of international criminal law: Double decline and practical turn. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2019;17(3):537-555. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqz033

Author

Christensen, Mikkel Jarle. / The judiciary of international criminal law : Double decline and practical turn. I: Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2019 ; Bind 17, Nr. 3. s. 537-555.

Bibtex

@article{6b183ee18aae458fbf7a25d1352b6ec7,
title = "The judiciary of international criminal law: Double decline and practical turn",
abstract = "The article investigates the judiciary of international criminal law and its development over time. Inspired by the sociological tools of Pierre Bourdieu and building on an original dataset, the article analyses the judiciary of three international criminal courts, namely the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Court and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. The focus of the analysis is on how the composition of expertise in the judiciary of these courts reflects the wider power structure in the field of international criminal law as well as temporal developments in this structure. Reflecting and responding to these transformations, the judiciary of international criminal law has been affected by a double decline of positions and prestige and a turn towards practice as the core expertise of the field. However, despite this turn to practice, the accumulation of political expertise continues to structure access to elite positions in the international criminal law judiciary.",
author = "Christensen, {Mikkel Jarle}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1093/jicj/mqz033",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "537--555",
journal = "Journal of International Criminal Justice",
issn = "1478-1387",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The judiciary of international criminal law

T2 - Double decline and practical turn

AU - Christensen, Mikkel Jarle

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The article investigates the judiciary of international criminal law and its development over time. Inspired by the sociological tools of Pierre Bourdieu and building on an original dataset, the article analyses the judiciary of three international criminal courts, namely the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Court and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. The focus of the analysis is on how the composition of expertise in the judiciary of these courts reflects the wider power structure in the field of international criminal law as well as temporal developments in this structure. Reflecting and responding to these transformations, the judiciary of international criminal law has been affected by a double decline of positions and prestige and a turn towards practice as the core expertise of the field. However, despite this turn to practice, the accumulation of political expertise continues to structure access to elite positions in the international criminal law judiciary.

AB - The article investigates the judiciary of international criminal law and its development over time. Inspired by the sociological tools of Pierre Bourdieu and building on an original dataset, the article analyses the judiciary of three international criminal courts, namely the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Court and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. The focus of the analysis is on how the composition of expertise in the judiciary of these courts reflects the wider power structure in the field of international criminal law as well as temporal developments in this structure. Reflecting and responding to these transformations, the judiciary of international criminal law has been affected by a double decline of positions and prestige and a turn towards practice as the core expertise of the field. However, despite this turn to practice, the accumulation of political expertise continues to structure access to elite positions in the international criminal law judiciary.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074433492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jicj/mqz033

DO - 10.1093/jicj/mqz033

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85074433492

VL - 17

SP - 537

EP - 555

JO - Journal of International Criminal Justice

JF - Journal of International Criminal Justice

SN - 1478-1387

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 230561234