National Courts of Last Instance Failing to Make a Preliminary Reference: – the (possible) consequences flowing therefrom

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

National Courts of Last Instance Failing to Make a Preliminary Reference : – the (possible) consequences flowing therefrom. / Broberg, Morten.

I: European Public Law, Bind 22, Nr. 2, 04.2016, s. 243-256.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Broberg, M 2016, 'National Courts of Last Instance Failing to Make a Preliminary Reference: – the (possible) consequences flowing therefrom', European Public Law, bind 22, nr. 2, s. 243-256. <http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=EURO2016016>

APA

Broberg, M. (2016). National Courts of Last Instance Failing to Make a Preliminary Reference: – the (possible) consequences flowing therefrom. European Public Law, 22(2), 243-256. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=EURO2016016

Vancouver

Broberg M. National Courts of Last Instance Failing to Make a Preliminary Reference: – the (possible) consequences flowing therefrom. European Public Law. 2016 apr.;22(2):243-256.

Author

Broberg, Morten. / National Courts of Last Instance Failing to Make a Preliminary Reference : – the (possible) consequences flowing therefrom. I: European Public Law. 2016 ; Bind 22, Nr. 2. s. 243-256.

Bibtex

@article{cb9a084dd99b49aab30d74dc7fd46302,
title = "National Courts of Last Instance Failing to Make a Preliminary Reference: – the (possible) consequences flowing therefrom",
abstract = "According to Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Member State courts may – and sometimes must – refer questions on the interpretation or validity of EU legal measures to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a binding preliminary ruling. But what are the consequences if a Member State court fails to make a preliminary reference in a situation where it was legally obliged to do so? The article shows that such failure may constitute an infringement of the right to a fair trial as laid down in Article 6(1) of the European Convention of Human Rights. It may also form the basis for a claim fordamages under EU law. Moreover, it may instigate the European Commission to institute infringement proceedings against the Member State in question. Finally, in some situations, a failure to make a preliminary reference may affect the validity of the Member State court{\textquoteright}s judgment, and there may also be a requirement on Member State administrative authorities to reopen the case file if, after the ruling by the Member State court, it becomes apparent that this court erred with regards to EU law.",
author = "Morten Broberg",
year = "2016",
month = apr,
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "243--256",
journal = "European Public Law",
issn = "1354-3725",
publisher = "Kluwer Law International",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - National Courts of Last Instance Failing to Make a Preliminary Reference

T2 - – the (possible) consequences flowing therefrom

AU - Broberg, Morten

PY - 2016/4

Y1 - 2016/4

N2 - According to Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Member State courts may – and sometimes must – refer questions on the interpretation or validity of EU legal measures to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a binding preliminary ruling. But what are the consequences if a Member State court fails to make a preliminary reference in a situation where it was legally obliged to do so? The article shows that such failure may constitute an infringement of the right to a fair trial as laid down in Article 6(1) of the European Convention of Human Rights. It may also form the basis for a claim fordamages under EU law. Moreover, it may instigate the European Commission to institute infringement proceedings against the Member State in question. Finally, in some situations, a failure to make a preliminary reference may affect the validity of the Member State court’s judgment, and there may also be a requirement on Member State administrative authorities to reopen the case file if, after the ruling by the Member State court, it becomes apparent that this court erred with regards to EU law.

AB - According to Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Member State courts may – and sometimes must – refer questions on the interpretation or validity of EU legal measures to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a binding preliminary ruling. But what are the consequences if a Member State court fails to make a preliminary reference in a situation where it was legally obliged to do so? The article shows that such failure may constitute an infringement of the right to a fair trial as laid down in Article 6(1) of the European Convention of Human Rights. It may also form the basis for a claim fordamages under EU law. Moreover, it may instigate the European Commission to institute infringement proceedings against the Member State in question. Finally, in some situations, a failure to make a preliminary reference may affect the validity of the Member State court’s judgment, and there may also be a requirement on Member State administrative authorities to reopen the case file if, after the ruling by the Member State court, it becomes apparent that this court erred with regards to EU law.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 22

SP - 243

EP - 256

JO - European Public Law

JF - European Public Law

SN - 1354-3725

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 147557948