International Cooperation on Migration Control: Towards a Research Agenda for Refugee Law

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

International Cooperation on Migration Control: Towards a Research Agenda for Refugee Law. / Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas.

I: European Journal of Migration and Law, Bind 20, Nr. 4, 2018, s. 373–395.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Gammeltoft-Hansen, T 2018, 'International Cooperation on Migration Control: Towards a Research Agenda for Refugee Law', European Journal of Migration and Law, bind 20, nr. 4, s. 373–395. <https://brill.com/view/journals/emil/20/4/article-p373_2.xml>

APA

Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. (2018). International Cooperation on Migration Control: Towards a Research Agenda for Refugee Law. European Journal of Migration and Law, 20(4), 373–395. https://brill.com/view/journals/emil/20/4/article-p373_2.xml

Vancouver

Gammeltoft-Hansen T. International Cooperation on Migration Control: Towards a Research Agenda for Refugee Law. European Journal of Migration and Law. 2018;20(4):373–395.

Author

Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas. / International Cooperation on Migration Control: Towards a Research Agenda for Refugee Law. I: European Journal of Migration and Law. 2018 ; Bind 20, Nr. 4. s. 373–395.

Bibtex

@article{ce64f6ce379741c09028b7758642ebbb,
title = "International Cooperation on Migration Control: Towards a Research Agenda for Refugee Law",
abstract = "This article sets out by reviewing the interplay between policy and law when it comes to measures aimed at deterring migrants and refugees. The current trend towards international cooperation represents a significant turning point, it is argued, creating important challenges for existing strategies of refugee and human rights lawyers. On this basis, and with a view to recent scholarship, the article explores three different avenues to address the current generation of deterrence. The first involves a step back to re-examine other bases for establishing extraterritorial human rights jurisdiction. Secondly, it is argued that existing efforts to establish state responsibility in the context of deterrence suffer from a Global North bias, and that more attention should be paid to the concurrent responsibility of partner states in regions of transit and origin, as well as the legal structures and litigation possibilities in these jurisdictions. Third and finally, the article makes a plea to move beyond narrow legal analysis in favor of more inter-disciplinary approaches highlighting the wider political and sociological dynamics pertaining to this area.",
author = "Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "373–395",
journal = "European Journal of Migration and Law",
issn = "1388-364X",
publisher = "Brill - Nijhoff",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - International Cooperation on Migration Control: Towards a Research Agenda for Refugee Law

AU - Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This article sets out by reviewing the interplay between policy and law when it comes to measures aimed at deterring migrants and refugees. The current trend towards international cooperation represents a significant turning point, it is argued, creating important challenges for existing strategies of refugee and human rights lawyers. On this basis, and with a view to recent scholarship, the article explores three different avenues to address the current generation of deterrence. The first involves a step back to re-examine other bases for establishing extraterritorial human rights jurisdiction. Secondly, it is argued that existing efforts to establish state responsibility in the context of deterrence suffer from a Global North bias, and that more attention should be paid to the concurrent responsibility of partner states in regions of transit and origin, as well as the legal structures and litigation possibilities in these jurisdictions. Third and finally, the article makes a plea to move beyond narrow legal analysis in favor of more inter-disciplinary approaches highlighting the wider political and sociological dynamics pertaining to this area.

AB - This article sets out by reviewing the interplay between policy and law when it comes to measures aimed at deterring migrants and refugees. The current trend towards international cooperation represents a significant turning point, it is argued, creating important challenges for existing strategies of refugee and human rights lawyers. On this basis, and with a view to recent scholarship, the article explores three different avenues to address the current generation of deterrence. The first involves a step back to re-examine other bases for establishing extraterritorial human rights jurisdiction. Secondly, it is argued that existing efforts to establish state responsibility in the context of deterrence suffer from a Global North bias, and that more attention should be paid to the concurrent responsibility of partner states in regions of transit and origin, as well as the legal structures and litigation possibilities in these jurisdictions. Third and finally, the article makes a plea to move beyond narrow legal analysis in favor of more inter-disciplinary approaches highlighting the wider political and sociological dynamics pertaining to this area.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

SP - 373

EP - 395

JO - European Journal of Migration and Law

JF - European Journal of Migration and Law

SN - 1388-364X

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 210156389