TY - CHAP

T1 - A Study in Gold: Gabriel Resources v. Romania

T2 - Qui Prodest? The Neo Liberal Rhetoric and the Multi-Facet Impact of the Investment Agreement in Roșia Montană

AU - Stanescu, Catalin Gabriel

PY - 2020/5/28

Y1 - 2020/5/28

N2 - There is a general wisdom that international investment law and investment-state arbitration contribute to the development of rule of law by enhancing features such as accountability, clarity, transparency, predictability, despite evidence to the contrary. Such wisdom stems from the neoliberal political, economic and legal discourse surrounding free trade and free markets, which were imposed and supported by international institutions on developing countries. Nevertheless, in many cases the neoliberal discourse was employed solely to justify economic plunder and the establishment of a predatory type of capitalism. The case brought by Gabriel Resources against Romania is one of the best examples thereof.Starting from the claim of Gabriel Resources regarding the mineral resources in Roșia Montană, this chapter adds to the ongoing debate, addressing how the neoliberal rhetoric is employed by claimants before international arbitration panels against the host state about a specific FDI project. By resorting to the facts of the case based on public or leaked documents related to the investment, it debunks the myth of the positive impact of investment agreements on societal developments and proves how the system set up by BITs and international conventions is being abused by unscrupulous ‘investors’ to the detriment of host states and local population.

AB - There is a general wisdom that international investment law and investment-state arbitration contribute to the development of rule of law by enhancing features such as accountability, clarity, transparency, predictability, despite evidence to the contrary. Such wisdom stems from the neoliberal political, economic and legal discourse surrounding free trade and free markets, which were imposed and supported by international institutions on developing countries. Nevertheless, in many cases the neoliberal discourse was employed solely to justify economic plunder and the establishment of a predatory type of capitalism. The case brought by Gabriel Resources against Romania is one of the best examples thereof.Starting from the claim of Gabriel Resources regarding the mineral resources in Roșia Montană, this chapter adds to the ongoing debate, addressing how the neoliberal rhetoric is employed by claimants before international arbitration panels against the host state about a specific FDI project. By resorting to the facts of the case based on public or leaked documents related to the investment, it debunks the myth of the positive impact of investment agreements on societal developments and proves how the system set up by BITs and international conventions is being abused by unscrupulous ‘investors’ to the detriment of host states and local population.

U2 - 10.1007/978-981-13-5744-2_110-1

DO - 10.1007/978-981-13-5744-2_110-1

M3 - Book chapter

VL - IV

SP - 1

EP - 27

BT - Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy

A2 - Chaisse, Julien

A2 - Choukroune, Leïla

A2 - Jusoh, Sufian

PB - Springer

ER -