COVID-19 restrictions in Ireland and Northern Ireland: a comparison of the legal framing of reasonableness
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › fagfællebedømt
Standard
COVID-19 restrictions in Ireland and Northern Ireland : a comparison of the legal framing of reasonableness. / Ó Cathaoir, Katharina; MacColl, Christie.
I: Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly , Bind 73, Nr. 2, 2022, s. 234-259.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - COVID-19 restrictions in Ireland and Northern Ireland
T2 - a comparison of the legal framing of reasonableness
AU - Ó Cathaoir, Katharina
AU - MacColl, Christie
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - In 2020, Ireland and Northern Ireland implemented separate legislative strategies to tackle COVID-19, despite the island comprising a single epidemiological unit. This article evaluates and contrasts the framing of ‘reasonable excuses’ in the regulations adopted by Ireland and Northern Ireland between March and December of 2020. It submits that the rejection of an ‘all-Ireland’ approach, side by side lack of effective regulatory coordination and enforcement, likely had implications for transmission in each state.The regulations have entailed far-reaching incursions on civil liberties, often without providing the public with a clear evidence base. The complexity of the legislation as well as conflicting government guidance, contributed to a climate of public confusion, which created subsequent difficulties for enforcement, notably in the border regions. Insufficient coordination undermined measures by allowing for loopholes to be exploited. The article reflects on the human rights implications thereof, focusing on transparency and proportionality.
AB - In 2020, Ireland and Northern Ireland implemented separate legislative strategies to tackle COVID-19, despite the island comprising a single epidemiological unit. This article evaluates and contrasts the framing of ‘reasonable excuses’ in the regulations adopted by Ireland and Northern Ireland between March and December of 2020. It submits that the rejection of an ‘all-Ireland’ approach, side by side lack of effective regulatory coordination and enforcement, likely had implications for transmission in each state.The regulations have entailed far-reaching incursions on civil liberties, often without providing the public with a clear evidence base. The complexity of the legislation as well as conflicting government guidance, contributed to a climate of public confusion, which created subsequent difficulties for enforcement, notably in the border regions. Insufficient coordination undermined measures by allowing for loopholes to be exploited. The article reflects on the human rights implications thereof, focusing on transparency and proportionality.
U2 - 10.53386/nilq.v73i2.958
DO - 10.53386/nilq.v73i2.958
M3 - Journal article
VL - 73
SP - 234
EP - 259
JO - Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly
JF - Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 315761562