COVID-19 restrictions in Ireland and Northern Ireland: a comparison of the legal framing of reasonableness

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

COVID-19 restrictions in Ireland and Northern Ireland : a comparison of the legal framing of reasonableness. / Ó Cathaoir, Katharina; MacColl, Christie.

I: Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly , Bind 73, Nr. 2, 2022, s. 234-259.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ó Cathaoir, K & MacColl, C 2022, 'COVID-19 restrictions in Ireland and Northern Ireland: a comparison of the legal framing of reasonableness', Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly , bind 73, nr. 2, s. 234-259. https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v73i2.958

APA

Ó Cathaoir, K., & MacColl, C. (2022). COVID-19 restrictions in Ireland and Northern Ireland: a comparison of the legal framing of reasonableness. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly , 73(2), 234-259. https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v73i2.958

Vancouver

Ó Cathaoir K, MacColl C. COVID-19 restrictions in Ireland and Northern Ireland: a comparison of the legal framing of reasonableness. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly . 2022;73(2):234-259. https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v73i2.958

Author

Ó Cathaoir, Katharina ; MacColl, Christie. / COVID-19 restrictions in Ireland and Northern Ireland : a comparison of the legal framing of reasonableness. I: Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly . 2022 ; Bind 73, Nr. 2. s. 234-259.

Bibtex

@article{a7c42c536c08482084d76097d7425e8d,
title = "COVID-19 restrictions in Ireland and Northern Ireland: a comparison of the legal framing of reasonableness",
abstract = "In 2020, Ireland and Northern Ireland implemented separate legislative strategies to tackle COVID-19, despite the island comprising a single epidemiological unit. This article evaluates and contrasts the framing of {\textquoteleft}reasonable excuses{\textquoteright} in the regulations adopted by Ireland and Northern Ireland between March and December of 2020. It submits that the rejection of an {\textquoteleft}all-Ireland{\textquoteright} approach, side by side lack of effective regulatory coordination and enforcement, likely had implications for transmission in each state.The regulations have entailed far-reaching incursions on civil liberties, often without providing the public with a clear evidence base. The complexity of the legislation as well as conflicting government guidance, contributed to a climate of public confusion, which created subsequent difficulties for enforcement, notably in the border regions. Insufficient coordination undermined measures by allowing for loopholes to be exploited. The article reflects on the human rights implications thereof, focusing on transparency and proportionality.",
author = "{{\'O} Cathaoir}, Katharina and Christie MacColl",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.53386/nilq.v73i2.958",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "234--259",
journal = "Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly ",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - COVID-19 restrictions in Ireland and Northern Ireland

T2 - a comparison of the legal framing of reasonableness

AU - Ó Cathaoir, Katharina

AU - MacColl, Christie

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - In 2020, Ireland and Northern Ireland implemented separate legislative strategies to tackle COVID-19, despite the island comprising a single epidemiological unit. This article evaluates and contrasts the framing of ‘reasonable excuses’ in the regulations adopted by Ireland and Northern Ireland between March and December of 2020. It submits that the rejection of an ‘all-Ireland’ approach, side by side lack of effective regulatory coordination and enforcement, likely had implications for transmission in each state.The regulations have entailed far-reaching incursions on civil liberties, often without providing the public with a clear evidence base. The complexity of the legislation as well as conflicting government guidance, contributed to a climate of public confusion, which created subsequent difficulties for enforcement, notably in the border regions. Insufficient coordination undermined measures by allowing for loopholes to be exploited. The article reflects on the human rights implications thereof, focusing on transparency and proportionality.

AB - In 2020, Ireland and Northern Ireland implemented separate legislative strategies to tackle COVID-19, despite the island comprising a single epidemiological unit. This article evaluates and contrasts the framing of ‘reasonable excuses’ in the regulations adopted by Ireland and Northern Ireland between March and December of 2020. It submits that the rejection of an ‘all-Ireland’ approach, side by side lack of effective regulatory coordination and enforcement, likely had implications for transmission in each state.The regulations have entailed far-reaching incursions on civil liberties, often without providing the public with a clear evidence base. The complexity of the legislation as well as conflicting government guidance, contributed to a climate of public confusion, which created subsequent difficulties for enforcement, notably in the border regions. Insufficient coordination undermined measures by allowing for loopholes to be exploited. The article reflects on the human rights implications thereof, focusing on transparency and proportionality.

U2 - 10.53386/nilq.v73i2.958

DO - 10.53386/nilq.v73i2.958

M3 - Journal article

VL - 73

SP - 234

EP - 259

JO - Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly

JF - Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 315761562