Legitimization Strategies of International Judges – University of Copenhagen

Forward this page to a friend Resize Print Bookmark and Share

iCourts > News > Legitimization Strateg...

09 June 2015

Legitimization Strategies of International Judges

Mikael Rask Madsen has just published the chapter “The Legitimization Strategies of International Judges: The Case of the European Court of Human Rights” in the book Selecting Europe's Judges: A Critical Review of the Appointment Procedures to the European Courts (Oxford University Press, 2015), edited by Michal Bobek.

Most research into the legitimacy of international courts shows very little interest in the judges of international courts and their selection and behaviour. Above all, mainstream research has been focused on the normative challenges to liberal democracy implied by international courts in terms of an alleged juridification and denationalization of politics. This paper raises the question of how international judges’ practices impact the legitimation of international courts. More specifically, it examines international judges’ ability to issue judgments that balance the development of the underlying legal frameworks of their courts with member states’ support and socio-political evolutions in society. To to do it replaces the dominant political science framework of inquiry with a sociological one which highlights the interplays between the agency of international courts and their surroundings. It argues in conclusion that international courts develop ways of legitimization which are contingent on historical socio-political developments, and particularly geopolitical developments causing structural change, the actual cases brought before them, and the forms of support they do or do not enjoy.

See further details.

A preliminary SSRN version of Madsen’s chapter is available here.